Asian Women - The Research Institute of Asian Women
[ Article ]
Asian Women - Vol. 32, No. 3, pp.101-120
ISSN: 1225-925X (Print)
Print publication date Sep 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14431/aw.2016.09.32.3.101

Suicide Ideation and Suicide Attempt Among Young Lesbian and Bisexual Filipina Women: Evidence for Disparities in the Philippines

ManalastasEric Julian
University of the Philippines Diliman, The Philippines

Abstract

Using archival data from a national survey of N=8,891 young Filipina women ages 15 to 24, this paper aimed to examine links between sexual-minority status and thinking about and attempting suicide. Similar to previous results from young Filipino men and to findings in the global LGBT mental health literature, sexual-minority status was associated with both suicide ideation and suicide attempt across measures of same-sex attraction and same-sex romantic relationships. Sexual-minority Filipina youth had higher odds of having thought about suicide and having attempted suicide, compared to heterosexual peers. Following a minority stress framework, this paper explored a number of correlates of suicide ideation and attempt, including normative risk factors such as depression, recent suicide attempt of a friend, and experiences of threat and victimization.

Keywords:

suicide ideation, suicide attempt, sexual orientation, lesbian, bisexual

Introduction

Suicide is a complex phenomenon, with social, cultural, and psychological dimensions. Suicide ideation and attempted suicide are serious concerns among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) populations (Haas et al., 2011; Poteat & Rivers, 2014; Pflum, Venema, Tomlins, Goldblum, & Bongar, 2015). Across samples, countries, methods of assessing sexual orientation, and research designs, LGB and transgender populations, particularly LGBT youth, have disproportionately higher levels of self-harm, suicide ideation, and attempted suicide (Marshal et al., 2011; Poteat & Rivers, 2014; Pflum et al., 2015; Skerrett, Kolves, & De Leo, 2015).

The paper extends previous findings that provided evidence for the existence of disparities in suicide ideation and attempted suicide among young sexual minority men in the Philippines (Manalastas, 2013) by focusing on sexual minority women, a term used in contemporary women’s health studies to refer to women who are non-heterosexual in at least one of the many dimensions of sexual orientation such as romantic or sexual attraction, same-gender sexual behavior, or identification as “lesbian” or “bisexual” (Bradford & Van Wagenen, 2013). This analysis contributes to the global literature on LGBT mental health by being the first empirical study on women’s suicide ideation and suicide attempt disparities along sexual orientation in the Philippine context.

Gender, Mental Health, and Suicide Risk

Gender is a powerful structural determinant of mental health (WHO, 2000). In particular, women have been found to be at higher risk for poor mental health outcomes such as disproportionately higher prevalence rates of trauma and post traumatic stress disorder (Tolin & Foa, 2006), anxiety disorder (Merikangas, Burstein, & Schmitz, 2013), mood disorder like unipolar depression (Kessler & Gadermann, 2013), and suicide ideation, suicide planning, and suicide attempt (Klonsky, May, & Saffer, 2016). This may be because of a number of systemic factors that disadvantage girls and women across societies. These factors include higher experience of sexual violence (including sexual assault and childhood sexual abuse), poverty and income inequality, subordinate social status, and even gender bias in medical diagnosis and health care (Lee, 2014).

One gender-related observation in the mental health literature is the so-called “gender paradox of suicide” (Canetto & Sakinofsky, 1998). Women have higher rates of suicide ideation and attempt, while men have higher rates of suicide deaths (Hawton, 2000). Various hypotheses have been proposed for this finding, for example, differential access to methods of suicide (men are more likely to have access to and utilize means such as firearms that are more likely to be fatal). However, feminist critics have pointed out that the strong focus on suicide mortality—deaths by suicide—has the effect of drawing attention away from the importance of morbidity reduction (Reyes & Reyes, 2004). That is, individuals, especially women, who do not end their life are likely to be still dealing with the stressors that burdened them to contemplate suicide in the first place, such as depression, violence, and poverty.

Beyond Gender Differences: Intersectionality and Sexual-minority Suicide Ideation and Attempt

Beyond examining gender disparities in suicide deaths and women’s greater risk for suicide ideation and attempted suicide, researchers are now challenged to consider the intersectional nature of social categories (Cole, 2009). One basic way to do this is by reflecting on who is included, and not included, within an analytic category like “women.”

One historically overlooked variable in gender research on mental health and suicide is sexual orientation, a person’s enduring pattern of romantic and sexual attractions for and desire to be in intimate relationships with those of the same sex, the other sex, or both (IOM, 2011). Traditional thinking in the mental health professions, driven by historical anti-LGBT stigma, did include sexual minority status in mental health practice—but only by equating same-gender sexual orientations as problematic and indicative of psychopathology (a pathologization model). This pre-1973 view has since been replaced by more empirically based theories that attempt to explain findings showing associations between sexual minority status and negative mental health outcomes such as disproportionately higher rates in depression, anxiety disorders, substance abuse, and suicide ideation and attempted suicide (IOM, 2011). Contemporary frameworks such as minority stress (Meyer & Frost, 2013) and structural stigma (Hatzenbuehler, Phelan, & Link, 2013) argue that these findings do not indicate that sexual minority status is pathological per se, the same way that gender is not a causal factor in depression or suicide ideation and attempted suicide. Rather, like gender, sexual minority status structures exposure to particular additional stressors such as those related to experiences of discrimination, as well as the quantity and quality of resources (e.g., competent, LGBT-friendly health care by medical professionals), all of which are important for coping with negative mental health outcomes.

With regard to suicide ideation and attempted suicide, there is now considerable evidence that indicates sexual minorities, especially sexual minority youth, are at disproportionately higher risk (Haas et al., 2011; Liu & Mustanski, 2012; Poteat & Rivers, 2014; Pflum et al., 2015). In particular, lesbian and bisexual women have been shown to have an increased risk of suicide attempts and suicide ideation, as well as depression, alcohol dependence, and substance abuse, compared to heterosexual women (King et al., 2008). This association has been found in populations such as Norwegian youth (Hegna & Wichstrøm, 2007), young adults in New Zealand (Skegg, Nada-Raja, Dickson, Paul, & Williams, 2003), adolescents in Guam (Pinhey & Millman, 2004), sexual minorities in Japan (DiStefano, 2008), and even in large Internet-based samples (Mathy, 2002) and in studies using prospective cohort designs (Mustanski & Liu, 2013). For instance, in one early paper using nationally representative data from the USA, Russell and Joyner (2001) showed that the prevalence of suicide ideation was much higher among lesbian and bisexual adolescent girls (28%) compared to heterosexual peers (15%). Suicide attempt prevalence was likewise elevated (12% versus 5%). A more recent analysis suggests that bisexual women may have the highest levels of suicide ideation and attempted suicide, compared to lesbian and heterosexual women, at least in the United States (Bolton & Sareen, 2011). The overall finding from the literature is that significant disparities exist for sexual minority populations—lesbian and bisexual girls and women are at disproportionately elevated risk for suicidal behaviors than heterosexual peers (Hass et al., 2011).

In line with current understandings of sexuality in psychology, contemporary research has shown that sexual orientation per se does not determine poor mental health outcomes (Meyer & Frost, 2013). Disparities in mental health outcomes among lesbian and bisexual women are in part due to minority stressors─the set of stressors experienced by sexual minorities who live in a culture of anti-LGBT social stigma. Across different cultures, sexual minorities like lesbian and bisexual women often grow up, work, and live in contexts of heteronormativity (Jackson, 2006) where cultural norms operate around and privilege heterosexuality, while stigmatizing lesbian and bisexual women, relationships, and populations, positioning same-sex love and relationships as nonexistent, deviant, or “immoral” and at the same time defining relationships between a man and a woman as good, “normal,” and “natural.” These conditions lead to stressors that include experiences of homonegative discrimination, pressure to conceal one’s sexuality, social rejection for being lesbian or bisexual, and self-stigma (“internalized homophobia”). According to the minority stress model, these minority stressors join normative stressors—the demands present in modern life for the general population, such as major life events, conflict, violence, poverty, etc.—in impacting on lesbian and bisexual mental health and well-being (Meyer & Frost, 2013).

The Philippine Context

Understanding lesbian and bisexual suicide risk requires examination of the social ecology of sexual minority populations wherever they may be located (Hong, Espelage, & Kral, 2011). In the Philippines, the minority status of lesbian and bisexual Filipinas is evident at structural and individual levels (Lim & Jordan, 2013). Sexual orientation here is not a fully protected category, though it was mentioned in the Magna Carta of Women (Ruizo, 2013), a national law that broadly seeks to eliminate discrimination against women in the Philippines. A handful of cities have legislated local anti-discrimination policies but only beginning the year 2003 (Manalastas, Ortega, Encinas-Franco, & Arugay, 2015), and even now there is no specific national law prohibiting anti-LGBT discrimination in employment, education, and health care, despite what one observer has described as “one of the longest running campaigns in the Philippines” (Thoreson, 2012, p. 552) by local LGBT rights activists and advocates in civil society, a campaign dating back to the 1990s. Though being lesbian or bisexual has never been criminalized as in neighboring Southeast Asian countries like Malaysia and Singapore (UNDP, USAID, 2014), no legal recognition of same-sex partnerships exists, restricting access of lesbian and bisexual women, especially those living in poverty, to important social protections such as social security, socialized housing, and government- administered loans which are enjoyed by married heterosexual couples (Lim & Jordan, 2013). At the same time, powerful anti-LGBT religious institutions like the Roman Catholic Church impose conservative moral ideologies, influencing the public as well as state policy on matters like education, LGBT representation in government, and sexual health services (Ruiz-Austria, 2004). As a country in Asia where majority of the population is Roman Catholic, traditional religion is often used as a means to suppress equality for sexual minorities, as when clergy publicly oppose proposed anti-discrimination laws, claiming that they will pave the way for “immoral” practices like same-sex marriage (UNDP, USAID, 2014). Finally, public opinion research also indicates that anti-lesbian prejudice is alive and well among Filipinos. Though Filipinos are comparatively less homonegative than survey respondents in Indonesia and Malaysia but have similar levels of homonegativity as Singaporean and Vietnamese respondents (Manalastas et al., 2015), nationally representative surveys from the mid-1990s to the present indicate that about 1 out of 4 Filipinos would reject lesbian and gay people as neighbors and that 28% of the Filipino adult population consider being lesbian as morally “unacceptable” (Manalastas & del Pilar, 2005; Manalastas, 2015).

The literature on suicide is scarce in the Philippines, where suicide mortality rates are officially low but increasing in incidence over the past three decades, possibly due to better reporting (Redaniel, Lebanan-Dalida, & Gunnell, 2011). The most recent available official estimates by the World Health Organization (2014) peg the suicide mortality rate for women ages 15 to 29 in the Philippines at 2.2 per 100,000 which is higher than in Malaysia (1.0 per 100,000) and in Vietnam (1.8 per 100,000) but relatively lower than in Indonesia (3.6 per 100,000), the United States (4.7 per 100,000), Singapore (6.0 per 100,000), Japan (10.8 per 100,000), and South Korea (14.9 per 100,000). Similar to the global mental health findings, suicide mortality among Filipinos is highly gendered, with a male-to-female suicide fatality ratio of 3.3:1 but with higher incidence of non-fatal suicide attempts among women, especially in the 15 to 24 age group (Redaniel, Lebanan-Dalida, & Gunnell, 2011).

In terms of disparities along sexual orientation, findings from a national sample of young Filipino men ages 15 to 24 indicate that gay and bisexual youth in the Philippines have disproportionately higher levels of non-fatal suicide behaviors compared to heterosexual peers (Manalastas, 2013). Sexual minority male youth had more than two times greater odds than heterosexual peers to report suicide ideation (odds ratio=2.09), and among those reporting suicide ideation, 39% of sexual minority male youth had attempted suicide, compared to 26% of heterosexual counterparts. This study was the first published report on mental health and suicidality disparities for sexual minorities, albeit only among men, based on a national sample in Southeast Asia.

For this paper, I present a secondary analysis of data from sexual minority and heterosexual female youth in the Philippines to provide evidence of disparities in suicide ideation and attempt among women. In addition, I explore other risk factors aside from sexual minority status available in the dataset, as suggested by minority stress theory (Meyer & Frost, 2013).

Problem

What is the prevalence of suicide ideation and attempted suicide for sexual minority female youth in the Philippines? And following the global literature on LGBT mental health, are young Filipina lesbian and bisexual women at disproportionately higher risk for suicide ideation and suicide attempt, compared to the general population? Specifically the goals of this analysis were twofold: (a) to determine the prevalence of suicide ideation and attempted suicide among young sexual minority Filipina women using existing nationally representative data; and (b) to examine any disparities in suicide ideation and attempted suicide among sexual minority Filipina youth, versus the general population. Additionally, I explore possible factors available in the data that could contribute to suicide ideation and attempt among lesbian and bisexual youth.


Method

Dataset

I reanalyzed archival survey data from the Third Young Adult Fertility & Sexuality Study (YAFS3), a large questionnaire-based interview study conducted by the University of the Philippines Population Institute. The data are based on a nationally representative sample of young Filipino adults from 16 administrative regions of the Philippines including the National Capital Region and the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao, and including 894 barangays (administrative neighborhoods), using two-stage cluster sampling. Respondents in the female subsample were 8,891 young Filipina women ages 15 to 24 (M=18.9, SD=2.9). Though collected a decade ago, the nationally representative YAFS3 dataset remains the largest and most comprehensive publicly available source of information for Filipino young adult sexuality and health outcomes (Raymundo & Cruz, 2004). YAFS3 is also the first nationally representative dataset in the Philippines to include items that allow analysis along women’s sexual orientation.

Variables

Suicide ideation and attempt. Respondents were asked if they had ever thought about suicide. Second, for those reporting suicide ideation, a follow-up probe asked if the respondents had ever attempted suicide. Both items were dichotomously scored (yes/no). In the overall dataset, 18.7% of women reported suicide ideation. Among those with ideation, 24.1% indicated having attempted suicide (4.5% of the overall women’s sample).

Sexual minority status. Sexual minority status was operationalized in the dataset in three ways: self-reported same-sex attraction, same-sex sexual behavior, and same-sex romantic relationships. For the attraction item, respondents were asked if they were attracted to men, to women, or to both. Those reporting attractions to other woman were classified as sexual minority. Missing responses were excluded from the analysis (n=254, 2.9%). In the analytic sample, 10.3% of women (n=885) reported attractions to both men and women, while 1.31% (n=113) reported attractions to other women exclusively. The rest (88.45%, n=7,639) were attracted only to men. Because of the centrality of attraction in the conceptual definition of sexual orientation and sexual minority status (IOM, 2011) as well as the low proportions on the sexual behavior and same-sex relationships items, this paper reports on analyses based on the attraction measure. To achieve sufficient statistical power, data from respondents with attraction to women exclusively and to both women and men were pooled during analysis to form the sexual-minority classification similar to precedents in the LGBT health literature (e.g., Russell & Joyner, 2001; Russell, 2003).

Normative risk factors. A number of variables in the dataset were available for inclusion in the analysis as general risk factors for suicide ideation and attempt. These normative factors are not specific to lesbian and bisexual youth and may apply to the entire female youth population. The general risk factors included were: (a) depressive symptomatology in the past three months, a three-item continuous scale ranging from 3 to 12, higher scores indicating higher levels of depressive symptoms (overall M=5.14, SD=1.81, Cronbach’s alpha=0.75); (b) recent peer suicide attempt, a dichotomous item (yes=23.9%); (c) experience of being physically threatened in the past three months, a dichotomous item (yes=16.7%); and (d) experience of being physically attacked by someone in the past three months, a dichotomous item (yes=10.7%). Global self-esteem was measured using a six-item five-point Likert-type scale (overall M=23.5, SD=3.1, Cronbach’s alpha= 0.67). Age, measured as a continuous variable (in years), was also included as a control variable, as in other suicide ideation and attempt research (Russell & Joyner, 2001; Russell, 2003).

Analysis

Separate cross-tabulation analysis of the two nonfatal suicide behavior indicators and sexual minority status were conducted in order to determine the prevalence of suicide ideation and suicide attempt among lesbian and bisexual Filipina youth, relative to heterosexual peers, and to test the hypothesis of disparities across sexual orientation. In addition, I ran logistic regressions with suicide ideation and attempt as the outcome variables. Sexual minority status was entered in a model along with age as a control to test the main hypothesis. Normative risk factors (depression, peer suicide attempt, threat, and victimization) were entered in a second regression model to determine if these general stressors could partly account for any effects of sexual minority status, as posited by the minority stress model (Meyer & Frost, 2013).


Results

Suicide Ideation and Attempt Disparities among Sexual Minority versus Heterosexual Filipina Women

Suicide ideation, as hypothesized, was disproportionately higher among sexual-minority Filipina youth, compared to heterosexuals (see Figure 1). Young lesbian and bisexual Filipina women had a higher rate of suicide ideation compared to other female youth. About one out of four women who were attracted to other women reported having thought of suicide (27%), disproportionately higher than other youth (18%),  (1)=43.84, Cramer’s V=.07, p<.001.

Figure 1.

Disproportionately Higher Rates of Suicide Ideation and Attempt among Sexual-minority Filipina Youth versus Heterosexual Peers

Sexual minority youth also had disproportionately higher rates of suicide attempt than heterosexual peers. More young bisexual and lesbian Filipina women reported attempting suicide (6.6%), than other young women (3.9%),  (1)=16.71, Cramer’s V=.04, p<0.001.

Predictors of Suicide Ideation and Attempt

Results from the logistic regression analyses for suicide ideation and attempt are presented here. In the first analysis, an analytic sample of N=8,487 cases was used. Prediction success was 81.04%. Odd ratios for the different predictors in the model are presented in Table 1. The initial model indicated that age and sexual minority status were both significantly associated with suicide ideation among young Filipina women. Specifically, sexual minority women had 67% higher odds of having thought of suicide, compared to other women,  (1)=44.42, p<.001, odds ratio=1.67 (95% CI=[1.44, 1.95]). This key finding supports the hypothesis of elevated suicide ideation for sexual minority women in the Philippines.

Predictors of Suicide Ideation among Filipino Female Youth (Odds Ratios with 95% Confidence Intervals)

In addition to sexual minority status as a predictor for suicide risk, normative stressors were significantly associated with thinking about suicide, namely: peer suicide attempt,  (1)=122.34, p<.001, odds ratio=2.98; experience of being threatened,  (1)=49.04, p<.001, odds ratio=1.65; victimization,  (1)=17.20, p<.001, odds ratio=1.42; and depression,  (1)=224.55, p<.001, odds ratio=1.26. Increasing global self-esteem was associated with lower odds of suicide ideation,  (1)=4.82, p<.05, odds ratio= 0.98. Filipina female youth regardless of sexual orientation who knew of a friend attempting suicide, who had experienced being threatened, who had been the victim of interpersonal violence, or who felt depressed were more likely to consider taking their own life. The results indicate that while experiences of threat, victimization, and depression do predict suicide ideation among Filipina youth as expected, sexual minority status (i.e., being lesbian or bisexual) still remained a significant predictor over and above those normative factors as suggested by the minority stress model (Meyer & Frost, 2013) and as found in previous research (Russell & Joyner, 2001; Russell, 2003).

Similar results for suicide attempt were obtained. Odd ratios for this set of analyses are shown in Table 2. The initial model, based on an analytic sample of N=8,631 cases with prediction success at 95.44%, indicated sexual minority status was significantly associated with suicide attempt among young Filipina women. Sexual minority women had twice higher odds of having attempted suicide, compared to other women,  (1)=32.9, p<.001, odds ratio=2.13 (95% CI=[1.65, 2.76]), supporting the hypothesis of elevated suicide risk, in both suicide ideation and attempt, for sexual minority women in the Philippines.

Apart from sexual minority status as a correlate for suicide attempt, normative stressors were again significantly associated with suicide risk, according to a regression model with all predictors (analytic sample n=8,484; prediction success 95.43%). These factors were peer suicide attempt,  (1)=34.91, p<.001, odds ratio=1.92; experience of being threatened,  (1)=31.07, p<.001, odds ratio=1.95; victimization,  (1)=28.89, p<.001, odds ratio=2.02; and depression,  (1)=115.70, p<.001, odds ratio=1.30. Increasing global self-esteem was likewise associated with lower odds of suicide risk,  (1)=6.41, p<.01, odds ratio=0.96.

Predictors of Suicide Attempt among Filipino Female Youth (Odds Ratios with 95% Confidence Intervals)

Examination of the odds ratios across the two regression models similarly indicated that while factors like experiencing threat, victimization, and depression may drive suicide attempt among Filipina youth, sexual minority status (i.e., being bisexual or lesbian) again remained a significant predictor for suicide attempt over and above those normative stressors as found in previous research (Russell & Joyner, 2001; Russell, 2003) and predicted by the minority stress model (Meyer & Frost, 2013).


Discussion

As with sexual minority Filipino men and similar to findings on sexual minority women in other parts of the world, being lesbian or bisexual was related to elevated suicide ideation and attempt in the Philippines. Analysis of nationally representative data indicates that, although the majority reports no ideation of or attempt at taking their own life, a significant number of young sexual minority Filipina women are at elevated risk for nonfatal suicide behaviors compared to peers. This association remained even when normative risk factors potentially affecting all women regardless of sexual orientation such as victimization and depression were accounted for (Russell, 2003; Meyer & Frost, 2013). Experiences of threat and violence, having a peer attempt suicide, and depression were all significantly associated with suicide ideation and attempt, similar to what has been found in other studies of lesbian and bisexual youth (Russell & Joyner, 2001). These findings are the first evidence that in the Philippines, lesbian and bisexual populations are experiencing critical disparities in well-being outcomes that require serious attention by mental health professionals and feminist scholars interested in women’s well-being.

Because normative stressors serve as entry points for intervention, existing programs for women’s health can be reviewed and adapted to incorporate these concerns. From an intersectional perspective, such intervention programs need to be aware of women’s diverse sexualities and provide specific resources for lesbian and bisexual women, who may be at higher risk for negative outcomes. For example, the data here suggest that mental health professionals, NGOs, and community stakeholders who successfully address the violence and threats to safety experienced by women, along with targeted initiatives for Filipina lesbian and bisexual youth, could help reduce suicide ideation and attempt. Inclusive interventions need to address the concerns of young lesbian and bisexual women, who often bear multiple burdens in a heteronormative, patriarchal society while simultaneously negotiating the general stressors of life experienced by all Filipina youth. Psychologists and other mental health professionals are in a good position to develop evidence-based, competent, and LGBT-affirmative interventions that advance the rights and well-being of members of the Filipino LGBT community, such as lesbian and bisexual youth (PAP, 2011). One example of a suicide prevention program specifically designed for sexual minority youth is the Trevor Project in the US, which operates a national crisis and suicide prevention lifeline for LGBT youth in addition to running in-school workshops and producing educational resources on sexual orientation and well-being (Haas et al., 2011).

In addition, structural interventions such as laws and public policies that are more inclusive of lesbian and bisexual women have been shown to be associated with positive health outcomes for sexual minority women (Hatzenbuehler, 2010). An example of this is anti-bullying policies that explicitly protect lesbian youth, which have been found to lead to reduced risk of suicide attempt among sexual minority women (Hatzenbuehler & Keyes, 2013). Policymakers in the Philippines would do well to build and follow up on initial attempts to include lesbian and bisexual women in public policy, such as in the Women’s Empowerment, Development, and Gender Equality Plan (2013-2016) of the Philippine Commission on Women (2014) which identifies LGBT populations as one of four “vulnerable groups” who do not enjoy full social development rights.

Future directions for research building on the current study can be along two lines of inquiry. First, we now have evidence for links between sexual minority status and suicide ideation and attempt in the Philippines. However research focusing on Filipino transgender mental health is virtually nonexistent. Second, protective factors that could specifically shield Filipino lesbian and bisexual women from suicide ideation and attempt could be investigated. Previous research into minority stress buffers has identified adult care and concern, family connectedness, and school and work safety as important resources for moderating the impact of stigma on LGBT well-being (Eisenberg & Resnick, 2006) and initial work in the Philippines has indicated parental acceptance, particularly from mothers, might be a promising factor (Reyes, Victorino, Chua, Oquendo, Puti, & Reglos, 2015).

As in all research in LGBT mental health and on suicide, the current analysis bears a number of limitations. Suicide ideation and attempt, as well as sexual minority status, were measured using single-item self-reports. Sexual minority status in particular was assessed using a self-report attraction-based measure, and as such, some level of underreporting of sexual minority status may be possible, as in all LGBT research. Any misclassification of lesbian and bisexual participants as heterosexual would have contributed however to dilution of differences; thus the current findings may be considered conservative estimates of the disparity levels. Future work should consider other indicators, though some recent evidence suggests that regardless of operationalization, associations between sexual minority status and suicide ideation and attempt appear to be robust (Almazan, Roettger & Acosta, 2014). The conclusions in this secondary analysis are limited by the variables in the YAFS3 dataset, which was designed as a broad survey of Filipino youth sexuality, not of lesbian and bisexual women’s health per se, and so does not fully capture the normative and minority stressors posited in the literature (for example, the problem of intimate partner violence in lesbian relationships; Lee, 2001). Finally, more recent data are needed to determine if the associations found here have persisted over time.

These caveats notwithstanding, given the strengths of nationally representative data (Saewyc, 2007), this study adds to the evidence for an increasingly recognized women’s issue in Asia (Chen, Wu, Yousuf, & Yip, 2011) and is a step forward in research into the mental health and well-being of women of diverse sexualities.

References

  • Almazan, E. P., Roettger, M. E., & Acosta, P. S., (2014), Measures of sexual minority status and suicide risk among young adults in the United States, Archives of Suicide Research, 18, p274-281. [https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2013.824832]
  • Bradford, J., & Van Wagenen, A., (2013), Research on the health of sexual minority women, In M. B. Goldman, R. Troisi, & K. M. Rexrode (Eds.), Women & Health, (2nd ed.), p77-91, London, Elsevier.
  • Bolton, S. L., & Sareen, J., (2011), Sexual orientation and its relation to mental disorders and suicide attempts: Findings from a nationally representative sample, Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 56(1), p35-43.
  • Canetto, S. S., & Sakinofsky, I., (1998), The gender paradox in suicide, Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 28, p1-23.
  • Chen, Y. Y., Wu, K. C. C., Yousuf, S., & Yip, P. S. F., (2011), Suicide in Asia: opportunities and challenges, Epidemiologic Reviews, 34(1), p129-144. [https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxr025]
  • Cole, E. R., (2009), Intersectionality and research in psychology, American Psychologist, 64(3), p170-180. [https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014564]
  • DiStefano, A. S., (2008), Suicidality and self-harm among sexual minorities in Japan, Qualitative Health Research, 18(10), p1429-1441. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732308322605]
  • Eisenberg, M. E., & Resnick, M. D., (2006), Suicidality among gay, lesbian and bisexual youth: The role of protective factors, Journal of Adolescent Health, 39, p662-668. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.04.024]
  • Haas, A. P., Eliason, M., Mays, V. M., Mathy, R. M., Cochran, S.D., D’Augelli, A. R., Silverman, M. M., Fisher, P. W., Hughes, T., Rosario, M., Russell, S. T., Malley, E., Reed, J., Litts, D. A., Haller, E., Sell, R. L., Remafedi, G., Bradford, J., Beautrais, A. L., Brown, G. K., Diamond, G. M., Friedman, M. S., Garofalo, R., Turner, M. S., Hollibaugh, A., & Clayton, P. J., (2011), Suicide and suicide risk in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender populations: Review and recommendations, Journal of Homosexuality, 58, p10-51. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2011.534038]
  • Hatzenbuehler, M. L., (2010), Social factors as determinants of mental health disparities in LGB populations: Implications for public policy, Social Issues and Policy Review, 4(1), p31-62. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2409.2010.01017.x]
  • Hatzenbuehler, M. L., & Keyes, K. M., (2013), Inclusive anti-bullying policies and reduced risk of suicide attempts in lesbian and gay youth, Journal of Adolescent Health, 53, pS21-S26. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.08.010]
  • Hatzenbuehler, M. L., Phelan, J. C., & Link, B. G., (2013), Stigma as a fundamental cause of population health, American Journal of Public Health, 103(5), p813-821.
  • Hawton, K., (2000), Sex and suicide: Gender differences in suicidal behaviour, British Journal of Psychiatry, 177, p484-485. [https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.177.6.484]
  • Hegna, K., & Wichstrøm, L., (2007), Suicide attempts among Norwegian gay, lesbian and bisexual youths: General and specific risk factors, Acta Sociologica, 50(1), p21-37. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699307074880]
  • Hong, J. S., Espelage, D. L., & Kral, M. J., (2011), Understanding suicide among sexual minority youth in America: An ecological systems analysis, Journal of Adolescence, 34(5), p885-894. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.01.002]
  • IOM (Institute of Medicine), (2011), The health of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people: Building a foundation for better understanding, Washington, DC, The National Academies Press.
  • Jackson, S., (2006), Interchanges: Gender, sexuality and heterosexuality: The complexity (and limits) of heteronormativity, Feminist Theory, 7(1), p105-121. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700106061462]
  • Kessler, R. C., & Gadermann, A. M., (2013), Gender and mood disorders, In M. B. Goldman, R. Troisi, & K. M. Rexrode (Eds.), Women & Health, (2nd ed.), p1247-1256, London, Elsevier.
  • King, M., Semlyen, J., Tai, S. S., Killaspy, H., Osborn, D., Popelyuk, D., & Nazareth, I., (2008), A systematic review of mental disorder, suicide, and deliberate self-harm in lesbian, gay and bisexual people, BMC Psychiatry, 8, p70-87. [https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-8-70]
  • Klonsky, E. D., May, A. M., & Saffer, B. Y., (2016), Suicide, suicide attempts, and suicide ideation, Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 12, p307-330. [https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093204]
  • Lee, K. H., (2001), Domestic violence in lesbian relationships: A challenge to feminist theory, Asian Women, 12, p195-217.
  • Lee, S. Y., (2014), Gender bias in the diagnosis of mental disorder, The Journal of Asian Women, 53(1), p153-190, (In Korean).
  • Lim, A. M., & Jordan, C. M., (2013), Policy audit: Social protection policies and urban poor LBTs in the Philippines, Bristol, Institute of Development Studies.
  • Liu, R. T., & Mustanski, B., (2012), Suicidal ideation and self-harm in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 42(3), p221-228. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2011.10.023]
  • Manalastas, E. J., (2013), Sexual orientation and suicide risk in the Philippines:Evidence from a nationally representative sample of young Filipino men, Philippine Journal of Psychology, 46(1), p1-13.
  • Manalastas, E. J., (2015, January, 28-30), Homonegativity in the Philippines: Tracking Filipino attitudes toward lesbians and gay men across a 17-year period, Paper presented at the 2015 Annual Scientific Conference of the Philippine Population Association, Davao, The Philippines.
  • Manalastas, E. J., & del Pilar, G. E. H., (2005), Filipino attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: Secondary analysis of 1996 and 2001 national survey data, Philippine Journal of Psychology, 38, p53-75.
  • Manalastas, E. J., Torre, B., Ojanen, T. T., Kumaresan, V., Veeramuthu, V., Choong, B., Ratanashevorn, R., & Boonkerd, S., (2015, March), Homonegativity in South East Asia: A comparison of attitudes toward lesbians, gay men, and their sexualities in Singapore, Thailand, the Philippines, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Vietnam, Paper presented at the 5th Asian Regional Union of Psychological Societies Conference, Singapore.
  • Manalastas, E. J., Ortega, A. A. C., Encinas-Franco, J. S., & Arugay, A. A., (2015, October), The UP Mapping Equality Project: Analyzing anti-discrimination policies in the Philippines, Paper presented at the Centennial Conference of the Department of Political Science, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon, The Philippines.
  • Marshal, M. P., Dietz, L. J., Friedman, M. S., Stall, R., Smith, H., McGinley, J., Thomas, B. C., Murray, P. J., D’Augelli, A., & Brent, D. A., (2011), Suicidality and depression disparities between sexual minority and heterosexual youth: A meta-analytic review, Journal of Adolescent Health, 49(2), p115-123. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.02.005]
  • Mathy, R. M., (2002), Suicidality and sexual orientation in five continents: Asia, Australia, Europe, North America, and South America, International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies, 7, p215-225.
  • Merikangas, K. R., Burstein, M., & Schmitz, A., (2013), Anxiety disorders in women, In M. B. Goldman, R. Troisi, & K. M. Rexrode (Eds.), Women & Health, (2nd ed.), p1257-1270, London, Elsevier.
  • Meyer, I. H., & Frost, D. M., (2013), Minority stress and the health of sexual minorities, In C. J. Patterson, & A. R. D’Augelli (Eds.), Handbook of psychology and sexual orientation, p252-266, New York, Oxford University Press.
  • Mustanski, B., & Liu, R. T., (2013), A longitudinal study of predictors of suicide attempts among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth, Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(3), p437-448. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-0013-9]
  • Pflum, S., Venema, K., Tomlins, J., Goldblum, P., & Bongar, B., (2015), Suicidal ideation and behavior among sexual minority youth: Correlates, vulnerabilities, and protective factors, In U. Kumar (Ed.), Suicidal behaviour: Underlying dynamics, p123-135, New York, Routledge.
  • Pinhey, T. K., & Millman, S. R., (2004), Asian/Pacific Islander adolescent sexual orientation and suicide risk in Guam, American Journal of Public Health, 94(7), p1204-1206. [https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.94.7.1204]
  • Poteat, V. P., & Rivers, I., (2014), Suicide ideation among sexual minority youth: The effects of bullying and possible protective factors, In P. Goldblum, D. L. Espelage, J. Chu, & B. Bongar (Eds.), Youth suicide and bullying: Challenges and strategies for prevention and intervention, p110-120, New York, Oxford University Press.
  • Philippine Commission on Women, (2014), Women’s empowerment, development, and gender equality plan, 2013-2016, Manila, Philippine Commission on Women.
  • PAP (Psychological Association of the Philippines), (2011), Statement of the Psychological Association of the Philippines on non-discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, Philippine Journal of Psychology, 44, p229-230.
  • Raymundo, C. M., & Cruz, G. T. (Eds.), (2004), Youth sex and risk behaviors in the Philippines, Quezon City, UP Population Institute.
  • Redaniel, M. T., Lebanan-Dalida, M. A., & Gunnell, D., (2011), Suicide in the Philippines: Time trend analysis (1974-2005) and literature review, BMC Public Health, 11, p536-545. [https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-536]
  • Reyes, M. V. T., & Reyes, B. V. Jr., (2004), Engendering Philippine mental health, Review of Women’s Studies, 14, p1-14.
  • Reyes, M. E., Victorino, M. C., Chua, A. P., Oquendo, F. Y., Puti, A. S., & Reglos, A. J., (2015), Perceived parental support as a protective factor against suicidal ideation of self-identified lesbian and gay Filipino adolescents, North American Journal of Psychology, 17(2), p245-250.
  • Ruiz-Austria, C. S., (2004), The church, the state and women’s bodies in the context of religious fundamentalism in the Philippines, Reproductive Health Matters, 12(24), p96-103.
  • Ruizo, L. C. S., (2013), A preliminary diction study of the Philippine Magna Carta of Women, Review of Women’s Studies, 21(1), p25-37.
  • Russell, S. T., (2003), Sexual minority youth and suicide risk, American Behavioral Scientist, 46, p1241-1257. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764202250667]
  • Russell, S. T., & Joyner, K., (2001), Adolescent sexual orientation and suicide risk:Evidence from a national study, American Journal of Public Health, 91, p1276-1281.
  • Saewyc, E. M., (2007), Contested conclusions: Claims that can (and cannot) be made from the current research on gay, lesbian, and bisexual teen suicide attempts, Journal of LBGT Health Research, 3(1), p79-87. [https://doi.org/10.1300/J463v03n01_09]
  • Skegg, K., Nada-Raja, S., Dickson, N., Paul, C., & Williams, S., (2003), Sexual orientation and self-harm in men and women, American Journal of Psychiatry, 160(3), p541-546. [https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.160.3.541]
  • Skerett, D. M., Kolves, K., & De Leo, D., (2015), Are LGBT populations at a higher risk for suicidal behaviors in Australia? Research findings and implications, Journal of Homosexuality, 62, p883-901. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2014.1003009]
  • Tolin, D. F., & Foa, E. B., (2006), Sex differences in trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder: A quantitative review of 25 years of research, Psychological Bulletin, 132(6), p959-992. [https://doi.org/10.1037/1942-9681.S.1.37]
  • Thoreson, R. R., (2012), Realizing rights in Manila: Brokers and the mediation of sexual rights in the Philippines, GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 18(4), p529-563.
  • UNDP, USAID, (2014), Being LGBT in Asia: The Philippines country report, Bangkok, United Nations Development Programme.
  • WHO (World Health Organization), (2000), Women’s mental health: An evidence based review, Geneva, World Health Organization.
  • WHO (World Health Organization), (2014), Preventing suicide: A global imperative, Geneva, World Health Organization.

Biographical Note: Eric Julian Manalastas is a faculty member at the Department of Psychology, University of the Philippines (UP) Diliman, The Philippines. He is a former deputy director of the UP Center for Women’s Studies, a former visiting lecturer at Sophia University in Tokyo, Japan, and the founding coordinator of the LGBT Psychology Special Interest Group of the Psychological Association of the Philippines. His research interests in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender psychology include LGBT health disparities, homonegativity, and friendships across sexual orientation. eric.manalastas@gmail.com

Figure 1.

Figure 1.
Disproportionately Higher Rates of Suicide Ideation and Attempt among Sexual-minority Filipina Youth versus Heterosexual Peers

Table 1.

Predictors of Suicide Ideation among Filipino Female Youth (Odds Ratios with 95% Confidence Intervals)

Predictor Model 1 Model 2
Note: Confidence Intervals are in brackets.
*p<.05
**p<.01
***p<.001
Age 1.03** [1.01, 1.05] 1.02* [1.00, 1.04]
Sexual Minority Status 1.67*** [1.44, 1.95] 1.47*** [1.25, 1.73]
Peer suicide attempt 1.98*** [1.75, 2.23]
Experience of threat 1.65*** [1.43, 1.90]
Victimization 1.42*** [1.20, 1.68]
Depression 1.26*** [1.22, 1.30]
Self-esteem 0.98* [0.96, 1.00]
-2 log likelihood 8396.35 7680.15

Table 2.

Predictors of Suicide Attempt among Filipino Female Youth (Odds Ratios with 95% Confidence Intervals)

Predictor Model 1 Model 2
Note: Confidence Intervals are in brackets.
*p<.05
**p<.01
***p<.001
Age 1.10*** [1.07, 1.14] 1.12*** [1.08, 1.16]
Sexual Minority Status 2.13*** [1.65, 2.76] 1.72*** [1.31, 2.25]
Peer suicide attempt 1.92*** [1.55, 2.39]
Experience of threat 1.95*** [1.54, 2.47]
Victimization 2.02*** [1.56, 2.61]
Depression 1.30*** [1.24, 1.36]
Self-esteem 0.96** [0.93, 0.99]
-2 log likelihood 3161.25 2798.77