Women Entrepreneurs’ Political Participation in China
Abstract
Based on a questionnaire survey of 132 female entrepreneurs in Zhejiang, a Chinese province that is famous for its entrepreneurship, this research examines female Chinese entrepreneurs’ participation in political processes by analyzing how female entrepreneurs undertake non-governmental positions from the following three perspectives: Their understanding of political participation, the determinants of their political participation, and their political participation behaviors. The research findings indicated that female entrepreneurs’ personal traits, such as their educational attainments, professional skills, and economic status, had significantly positive impacts on their political participation, and that the division of labor within households was no longer a constraint to female entrepreneurs’ political participation. Huge gaps were identified between what women entrepreneurs understood and perceived, and what motivated their political participation. Female entrepreneurs’ families had neither encouraging nor discouraging attitudes toward their political participation. Organizations, however, played fundamental roles in facilitating and arranging for female entrepreneurs’ political participation. Most female entrepreneurs’ political participation was more characteristic of an organizational arrangement, while improving business performance and advancing their own interests were female entrepreneurs’ real concerns for becoming politically engaged.
Keywords:
female entrepreneur, political participation, non-governmental positions, Zhejiang, ChinaIntroduction
Women’s comprehensive development has become both a national and an international policy priority. The Platform for Action launched at the 1995 World Conference on Women in Beijing promoted women’s active participation in all spheres of public and private life through a full and equal share in economic, social, cultural and political decision-making. China National Program for Women’s Development (2011-2020) also aimed at achieving women’s comprehensive development in political, economic, cultural, social and other spheres. Since the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, women in China have played increasingly important roles in many arenas, and their life opportunities, economic, and social status have improved significantly, while their political participation has lagged severely. Due to a long history of patriarchy and feudalism, there remains a big gap between women and men in terms of equal political participation. According to a policy briefing on international women’s political participation provided by the Women’s Studies Institute at the All-China Women’s Federation, by January 1, 2010, in 47 countries, over 25% of women were ministers of the government; however, out of 26 ministers in China, only 3, or 11.5%, were females, and China was ranked 61st in the world; by January 31, 2011, female representatives in the People’s Congress1 accounted for 21.3%, and China ranked 55th in the world (“Women’s Studies Institute,” 2011).
Other data from the Organization Department of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China2 showed that in 2009 women accounted for 11% of ministers, autonomous regional and provincial heads, 13.7% of provincial department heads and prefecture heads, and 16.6% of county and municipal heads (Beijing News, 2012). The results of the Third Survey of Chinese Women’s Social Status3 conducted by the All-China Women’s Federation and State Bureau of Statistics of China in late 2010 also confirmed women’s low political participation rate: Female leaders in the governments, government-affiliated organizations, public institutions and enterprises only accounted for 2.2% of employed women (“Project Group,” 2011).
The Chinese government recognized this gap, and designed many institutional arrangements to facilitate women’s political participation. In terms of women’s political participation, however, the government’s main attempt to increase the number of women assuming government leadership positions was adopting a gender quota policy tool. For women who do not have full-time positions in the governments at different levels, however, there are very few channels for them to become politically involved.
Given an increasing number of female entrepreneurs, and the fact that more entrepreneurs wish to participate in the political arena, it is timely that the political participation of female entrepreneurs should be examined. This study examines female entrepreneurs’ political participation by means of non-governmental positions. By non-governmental positions, we mean political positions not in the governmental offices. The paper is comprised of four parts. We use a literature review to develop a theoretical framework and define the terms pertinent to this study. In the methods, we describe our survey, research site, and the characteristics of our respondents. In the results, we present our research findings on the understandings, determinants, and behaviors that motivate female entrepreneurs’ political participation. The discussions and conclusions summarize female entrepreneurs’ political participation in China.
Theoretical Framework and Definitions of Terms
There are two dominant research themes in the literature pertinent to women’s involvement in the political process: women’s political participation, and entrepreneurs’ political participation. The former focuses on female cadres in full-time leadership positions in government offices at different levels. The latter examines entrepreneurs’ political participation in very limited forms, namely as representatives of the People’s Congress, and members of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC). Very few of these studies address the gender perspective.
Female entrepreneurs’ political participation by means of non-governmental positions is a significantly neglected area of research. The reason for this is that fewer female entrepreneurs, and most scholars, define their understanding of political participation narrowly as taking leadership positions in various government departments. In this paper we review the literature on both of the above two themes, and develop an analytical framework for female entrepreneurs’ political participation in China.
Women’s Political Participation
There is a rich body of literature on women’s political participation in China based on studies of female cadres in government departments that encompasses the following aspects:
- 1. The status quo of women’s political participation, and especially women’s underrepresentation in the political arena, which is indicated by the fact that only a small number of women have leadership positions in the government and most female leaders assume associate positions (Li, 2005; “Project Group,” 2011).
- 2. The socio-cultural constraints on women’s political participation include traditional gender norms and the characteristic division of household labor (Hsiung, 2001; Pei & Liu, 2010; Zhang, 2014); Politically engaged women face greater pressures and more demanding responsibilities than their male counterparts (Guo, 2016).
- 3. The institutional arrangements governing women’s political participation include the application of the gender quota policy (Chen & Liu, 2008; Song, 2016; Wang, 2013).
- 4. Politically engaged women typically have a better education and relatively higher economic status than other women (Li & Zhang, 2016).
Entrepreneurs’ Political Participation
For quite a long period of time before 1978, China put its main efforts into political movements. Since 1978, when China initiated its reform and open-up policy, China’s focus shifted from the political arena to that of economic development. Businesses became a dominant sector. In early 2000, the Chinese government recognized entrepreneurs as an important social force (Chen, Lu, & He, 2008), and today entrepreneurs continue to be a growing social force in China. The literature on entrepreneurial political participation focuses on the positive relationships between entrepreneurs’ political participation and their business performance. Entrepreneurs’ political participation could serve to strengthen their own political influence, build up their social networks with local governments, protect their own business interests, and facilitate the future development of their businesses by obtaining more and longer-term loans from state banks, being entitled to more favorable tax policies and having easier access to certain competitive or monopoly industries (Hu, 2006; Lang, 2015; Song, Feng, & Tan, 2014).
An Analytical Framework for Female Entrepreneurs’ Political Participation
Female entrepreneurs’ political participation has had significant impacts not only on women as an entire group, but also on entrepreneurs as the new-rich (Guo & Dong, 2006). Following a review of the literature of both women’s political participation and entrepreneurs’ political participation, this study undertakes to answer the following three questions to advance our understanding of Chinese female entrepreneurs’ political participation: (1) How do female entrepreneurs understand their political participation? (2) What are the determinants of female entrepreneurs’ political participation? (3) How do female entrepreneurs practice political participation?
Term Definitions
Before analyzing female entrepreneurs’ political participation, we will define the two key terms discussed in this paper: female entrepreneurs and political participation. In this research, female entrepreneurs include not only female partners and owners of businesses, but also female business managers. Political participation in general encompasses the various activities citizens undertake to influence government behaviors. In this research, given that female entrepreneurs have full-time jobs, their political participation is only represented in the following five forms, namely, as representatives of the People’s Congress, as members of the CPPCC, as representatives of a women’s congress, as representatives of the CPC, or as directors or committee members of a trade and commerce union.
Data and Methods
We used a list of politically active female entrepreneurs provided by the Zhejiang Women Entrepreneurs Association in early 2016, to generate a random sample of study participants that included 150 female entrepreneurs in 11 prefectural cities of Zhejiang province. Through face-to-face or phone interviews, we conducted 14 questionnaire surveys in each of 9 prefectural cities that included Hangzhou, Ningbo, Wenzhou, Jiaxing, Shaoxing, Taizhou, Jinhua, Huzhou, and Quzhou, and 12 questionnaire surveys in each of 2 prefectural cities that included Zhoushan and Lishui, which are the two prefectural cities in Zhejiang with the lowest GDP. Excluding incomplete surveys, we obtained 132 valid completed questionnaires.
Zhejiang was selected as our research site because this province is well known in China for its active entrepreneurial and prosperous businesses, and it has the largest number of enterprises which are listed among China’s top 500 private enterprises (“All China Federation,” 2016). A recent survey of female entrepreneurs in Zhejiang province showed that by the end of November 2016, the 1,463,300 businesses that had been established by women accounted for 28% of all the businesses in Zhejiang (“Zhejiang Provincial Administration,” 2017).
The questions asked in our survey gathered basic information about female entrepreneurs and their businesses (see Table 1), their understanding of political participation (Tables 2-8), the determinants of their political participation (Tables 9-15), and their political participation behaviors (Tables 16-17).
Female Entrepreneurs’ Political Participation in China
Female Entrepreneurs’ Understanding of Political Participation
Before we discuss the determinants of women’s entrepreneurial political participation, we first examine the female entrepreneurs’ understanding of political participation by verifying how important it is to these women to be politically involved (see Tables 2 and 3), how they perceive their own political status and power (Table 4), tokenism (Table 5), political abilities (Table 6), the political channels through which they can be politically involved (Table 7), and finally by identifying their own motivations for being politically involved (Table 8).
Female entrepreneurs were in unanimous agreement on the importance of political participation: 73.48% considered political participation very important, 19.70% considered it important; and none of the respondents thought that political participation was unimportant (see Table 2).
When asked how much they cared about being able to participate in the political arena, however, none of the respondents cared very much about being able to be politically involved; about half of them (46.97%) did not care at all; the other 33.33% said that they just complied with the organization’s arrangement, which served as a synonym for not caring (see Table 3). Female entrepreneurs perceived political participation as being important, however, as individuals they did not care much about being able to participate in the political arena.
Most female entrepreneurs evaluated their political status and power as neither high nor low. As shown in Table 4, most respondents (65.91%) perceived female entrepreneurs’ political status and power as just neither high nor low. Of the respondents, 13.64% believed that female entrepreneurs had low political status, while exactly the same percentage believed that they had high political status and power.
Responses to the question, “do you feel any tokenism in women’s political participation” further clarified female entrepreneurs’ perceptions of their own political status and power: 72.73% of respondents perceived some tokenism in female entrepreneurs’ political participation (see Table 5).
Female entrepreneurs obviously had strong confidence in their own ability to participate in political processes, and when asked to compare their own abilities to those of men, a large percentage (86.36%) of female entrepreneurs believed their abilities equaled those of men, and 4.55% even believed their abilities were greater than those of men (see Table 6).
This study also examined female entrepreneurs’ perceptions of political participation channels. No respondents thought that there were many such channels, and most of them believed there were comparatively few (46.97%) or very few channels (19.70%) by means of which female entrepreneurs could become politically involved (see Table 7).
The final survey question on female entrepreneurs’ understandings of their political participation pertained to their motivations (see Table 8). The respondents were asked to select from multiple possible answers to explain their motivations. Only 26.51% of the respondents said that their political participation was for the purpose of fulfilling their rights and obligations as citizens. Their motivations indicated a strong gender perspective, and significant self-interest that included upgrading women’s social consciousness and status (59.85%), fulfilling one’s own social values and influence (66.67%), fulfilling one’s own values (59.85%), and benefitting one’s own career and business development (53.03%).
Determinants of Female Entrepreneurs’ Political Participation
In this section, we classify the determinants of female entrepreneurs’ political participation into three categories: (1) individual factors, (2) organizational factors, and (3) family and public factors. For the individual factors, we examined the impacts of female entrepreneurs’ personal traits—including their educational attainments and professional skills (see Table 9) and economic status (Table 10)—on their political participation. With regard to organizational factors, we identified the roles played by organizations in facilitating female entrepreneurs’ political participation (Table 11) and mobilizers of female entrepreneurs’ political participation (Table 12). Under family and public factors, we examined families’ attitudes toward female entrepreneurs’ political participation (Table 13), how major housework responsibilities were undertaken in female entrepreneurs’ households (Table 14), and public attitudes toward female entrepreneurs’ political participation (Table 15). Tables 9-11 summarized participants’ responses to the questions regarding how they perceived their educational attainments and professional skills, economic status, and organizational recommendation had impacted their political participation.
Female entrepreneurs’ educational attainments and professional skills had significantly positive impacts on their political participation. Most female entrepreneurs believed that their educational attainments and professional skills were very important (53.03%) or important (33.33%) to their political participation (see Table 9). An equally important determinant of female entrepreneurs’ political participation was their economic status (19.70% very important and 66.67% important) (see Table 10).
Most respondents believed that an organization’s recommendation was very important (39.39%) or important (46.97%) to their political participation. No one thought that an organization’s recommendation was not at all important (see Table 11). In the Chinese context, organization does not just describe a system comprised of a group of people or a particular unit. Especially, in political discourse, organization is a general term that describes any officially established unit or collective of such units with specific legal status, authority, and resources. The term organization as used in this paper is consistent with the general meaning of the term in the Chinese context. The organization plays a very important role in facilitating individuals’ political participation in China, and therefore an organization’s recommendation is extremely important. Many important life opportunities, such as joining the Communist Party of China, the army, and being the member of a political or economic organization, depends on receiving a recommendation from an organization.
Responses to the question about the mobilizers of female entrepreneurs’ political participation also confirmed the importance of the organization (see Table 12). For 40.15% of the respondents, their political participation was the result of an organization’s mobilization and recommendation. Only 19.70% of the respondents were politically involved by their own choice, and no respondents were mobilized by family members.
Having said that no female entrepreneurs had been mobilized to participate in politics by their family members, it was interesting to note that no one said their family members were opposed to their political participation (see Table 13). Instead, 40.15% of respondents reported that their family members supported their political participation, and another 40.15% held neutral attitudes.
In the responses to our survey, only very few (6.82%) female entrepreneurs reported that they had major housework responsibilities in their households (see Table 14). In the households of 53.03% of female entrepreneurs, wives and husbands shared the housework. About one third of the female entrepreneurs received help with the housework either from housekeepers (6.82%) or their parents/relatives (26.51%).
Public attitudes toward female entrepreneurs’ political participation were quite complicated (see Table 15). Only 13.64% of female entrepreneurs believed they had both the trust and support of the public, and the same percentage of female entrepreneurs believed they received neither trust nor support. When we classified the responses to the questions on public attitudes into two groups—trust and support—66.67% of female entrepreneurs believed that they had public support (13.64% trust and support, and 53.03% no trust yet support), and 73.49% believed they did not have the public trust (53.03% no trust yet support, 13.64% neither trust nor support, 6.82% no trust). The interesting findings here were that most female entrepreneurs perceived that they received more public support than public trust. There may be various reasons for this paradox: the public may have believed that female entrepreneurs’ political participation was a right and necessary cause, but they did not necessarily believe that female entrepreneurs had the power to make much difference.
Political Participation Behaviors
The two major political participation behaviors and duties of female entrepreneurs are voting and making policy recommendations. Here we examined how female entrepreneurs voted in their political organizations (see Table 16), and which policy topics they proposed (see Table 17). Most respondents took voting very seriously, and 85.6% of respondents attended votes. However, 8.82% of women entrepreneurs never voted, which indicates that they actually did not care to fulfill their obligation and right to vote.
Female entrepreneurs’ biggest concerns pertained to their own industry, and 66.67% of female entrepreneurs had once proposed policies on industrial issues. One third of the female entrepreneurs (33.33%)—who included mothers—were also concerned about children and women’s issues. Political issues were the least concerning issue overall, and accounted for only 6.82% of respondents policy proposals.
Discussion and Conclusions
By examining female entrepreneurs’ political participation in China, we found that female entrepreneurs’ personal traits—such as educational attainment, professional skills, and economic status—had significant impacts on their political participation. Female entrepreneurs, who are on average better educated than urban women, also achieve higher economic status, which in turn gives them confidence, abilities, and the resources they need to be politically engaged.
The division of labor in households that influences most women’s political participation is not a problem for female entrepreneurs. This may be due to the fact that their higher economic status leads to equal status between males and females in the households, and their greater capacity to engage professional housekeepers.
We also identified complicated relationships among female entrepreneurs, their families, and their organizations. Female entrepreneurs with higher educational attainments and skills, and better economic status, were physically ready but not yet motivated to participate in political processes. Their families held neutral attitudes toward their political participation. It is the organization that plays a decisive role in motivating female entrepreneurs’ political participation. Our research findings have enabled us to better understand the perceptions, determinants, and behaviors of female entrepreneurs’ political participation in China.
Understanding Female Entrepreneurs’ Political Participation Perceptions and Determinants: Paradoxes and Conflicts
Several pairs of paradoxes and conflicts regarding female entrepreneurs’ perceptions and the determinants of their political participation—more specifically, perceptions versus motivations, and family mobilization versus family attitudes—were identified.
Perceptions versus motivations. There are huge gaps between what female entrepreneurs understood and perceived, and what motivated their political participation. They understood the importance of political participation, yet they did not care much about their own political participation. They were confident in their own abilities to participate in the political arena, which they believed to be equal to or even stronger than their male counterparts, yet they were not eager to become politically involved. The reasons behind these paradoxes and conflicts might be the barriers created by traditional gender norms, the lack of opportunities to participate in political processes, and complicated public attitudes toward women’s political participation.
Family mobilizations versus family attitudes. Participants’ responses to questions related to families’ attitudes toward politically engaged female entrepreneurs revealed ambivalent attitudes: no female entrepreneurs had been mobilized by their family members to become politically engaged, yet no female entrepreneurs said their families did not support them when they did so. It seems that female entrepreneurs’ families had a neither encouraging nor discouraging attitude toward their political participation.
Female Entrepreneurs’ Political Participation Behaviors: By Whom and for Whom
By whom female entrepreneurs were mobilized and recommended. Unlike most western countries, where women’s political participation is the outcome of lengthy women’s rights movements and women’s own preferences, most Chinese women’s political participation is more likely to be the result of an organizational arrangement rather than an expression of their own wills. Many organizations in China, including trade unions and entrepreneurial associations, have close ties with the governments at the different levels. By joining these organizations, women have access to both the information and opportunities necessary to political engagement. Therefore, it is apparent that organizations play fundamental roles in facilitating and arranging for female entrepreneurs’ political participation.
For whom female entrepreneurs become politically engaged. It is not surprising that most female entrepreneurs proposed policies relevant to their own industries and women and children’s issues, given that female entrepreneurs tended to think that their political participation was about upgrading women’s social consciousness and status, and fulfilling their own social values, rather than fulfilling their rights and obligations as citizens. This finding indicates that their real concerns for becoming politically engaged involved improving their own business performance and advancing their own interests.
In conclusion, female entrepreneurs’ political participation in China is still in the early stage, and it is unavoidable that they will encounter tokenism and face public distrust. The status of female entrepreneurs’ political participation will be improved in the future, if they are able to develop greater awareness of their basic political rights, and governments at different levels provide them with more opportunities to actively participate in political arena.
Notes
References
- All China Federation of Industry and Commerce, (2016, August), 2016 China Top 500 Private Enterprises List, Retrieved May 22, 2017, from http://www.acfic.org.cn/web/c_000000010003000100010002/d_46979.htm (In Chinese).
- Chen, Q., & Liu, X., (2008), Protection policies and women’s public participation: Observation of the experiment with “votes disaggregated by sex” in H village in Guangshui, Hubei, Collection of Women’s Studies, 84(1), p21-27, (In Chinese).
- Chen, Z., Lu, M., & He, J., (2008), Power and entrepreneurs’ political participation, World Economy, 6, p39-49, (In Chinese).
- Guo, W., (2016), A probe into Chinese females’ participation in politics, Journal of Wenzhou University (Social Science), 29(3), p78-83, (In Chinese).
- Guo, X., & Dong, Y., (2006), Female, wealth, politics: An analysis on female entrepreneurs’ political participation by a case study in Wenzhou, Journal of China Women’s University, 18(2), p55-61, (In Chinese).
- Hsiung, P., (2001), The outsider within and the insider without: A case study of Chinese women’s political participation, Asian Perspective, 25(4), p213-237.
- Hu, X., (2006), Private entrepreneurs’ political identities and private businesses’ financing conveniences: A case study of top 100 private businesses in Zhejiang, Management World, 5, p107-113, (In Chinese).
- Lang, P., (2015), Observation of entrepreneurs’ political participation as representatives of the People’s Congress, People’s Tribune, 5, p21-25, (In Chinese).
- Li, H., (2005), A review and appraisal of Chinese women’s decade of participation in politics, Collection of Women’s Studies, 68(6), p34-38, (In Chinese).
- Li, W., & Zhang, Y., (2016), The family status of women participating in politics: From the perspective of resources, power and responsibility, Journal of China Women’s University, 2016(1), p50-56, (In Chinese).
- Pei, Y., & Liu, X., (2010), An exploration of women’s dilemma in public affairs administration: A case study of 20 female county heads, Journal of Nanjing College for Population Programme Management, 26(3), p21-26, (In Chinese).
- Project Group of the 3rd Survey on the Status of Chinese Women, (2011), Executive report of the 3rd Survey on the Status of Chinese Women, Collection of Women’s Studies, 108(6), p5-15, (In Chinese).
- Song, Y., (2016), Institutionalizing rural women’s political participation in China: Reserved seats election for women, Asian Women, 32(3), p77-99.
- Song, Z., Feng, L., & Tan, X., (2014), State ownership, political participation of private entrepreneurs and convenience of enterprise financing: An empirical research on China’s private controlled listed companies, Journal of Financial Research, 414(12), p133-147, (In Chinese).
- Wang, Q., (2013, March), Gender quotas in China, Paper presented at the 3rd European Conference on Politics and Gender, Barcelona.
- Women’s Studies Institute at All-China Women’s Federation, (2011), International women’s political participation status in 2010, Research Information Briefing, 116(3), p1-10, (In Chinese).
- Wu, W., (2012, March, 8), Chinese female officials’ “olive-shaped” pattern to be solve d. Beijing News A 25, Retrieved May 22, 2017, from http://epaper.bjnews.com.cn/html/2012-03/08/content_322638.htm?div=-1 (In Chinese).
- Zhang, Y., (2014), A study on the different role assignments according to gender and on women’s political participation: Based on the analysis of the survey data concerning women’s social status in China, Journal of Shandong Women’s University, 116(4), p30-38, (In Chinese).
- Zhejiang Provincial Administration for Industry & Commerce, (2017), 2016 Yearly Report of Zhejiang Women’s Entrepreneurship, Retrieved May 22, 2017, from http://gw.yjbys.com/baogao/100799.html (In Chinese).
Biographical Note: Jianmin Zheng is Associate Professor at Teaching Center, Zhejiang Radio and TV University, China. He has researched and published a few journal articles on China’s urbanization, local governance, gender policy, education policy and reform. E-mail:zhengjm@zjtvu.edu.cn
Biographical Note: Wenrong Qian (Corresponding author) is Professor at China Academy for Rural Development, Zhejiang University. He has researched, published many journal articles and monographs on China’s urbanization, labor migration, local governance, gender issues and land policy. E-mail:wrqian@zju.edu.cn