Asian Women - The Research Institute of Asian Women
[ Article ]
Asian Women - Vol. 37, No. 3, pp.51-73
ISSN: 1225-925X (Print) 2586-5714 (Online)
Print publication date 30 Sep 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14431/aw.2021.9.37.3.51

Women and Substance Abuse: Examining the Factors Influencing Relapse

Asbah Razali ; Zainal Madon ; Mohammed Salah Hassan
Universiti Malaya, Malaysia Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia UniversitiMalaya, Malaysia

Abstract

Substance abuse in society is a source of concern, especially since it is spreading among women. Previously, substance abuse was associated with drug use by men, but today, women are increasingly involved as well. The purpose of this study is to determine the factors that influence relapse among female former addicts. This was a cross-sectional study of 50 former substance abusers, six months after receiving treatment at the Cure & Care Rehabilitation Centre. All respondents completed the questionnaires and the outcome was evaluated by the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). The results show a positive and significant relationship between family support and relapse (r = 0.183), and there is a positive and significant relationship between support from friends and relapse (r = 0.009). On the other hand, there is a significant but negative relationship between motivation and relapse (r = -0.387). There is also a significant negative relationship between self-esteem and relapse (r = -0.035). Women with drug addiction suffer from multiple stresses and a high risk of relapse and require significant social support from family and friends to resist the urge to relapse. It may be concluded that the inclination to relapse decreases when there is an increase in family and friend support, motivation, and self-esteem.

Keywords:

relapse, women substance abuse, addiction, social support, high risk, motivation, self-esteem

Introduction

The issue of substance abuse was once synonymous with men, but it is also a problem that increasingly affects women. Malaysia’s rapid economic and social growth has resulted in a transformation of women’s roles, including careers, responsibilities, and identity. The pressures on women as a result of these changes have, to a certain extent, contributed to an increase in social ills among women, particularly substance abuse. In addition, in this way of a lifestyle driven by materialistic desires, some women got carried away by the flow of this life and bargained their values and morals to achieve prosperity. Women are found to have a higher risk of drug dependence, drug overuse, and relapse (Addiction Center, 2019). This is very worrying, as women are an important national asset that should be optimally developed to allow them to actively and effectively contribute to national and societal development. Relapse occurs within the first three to six months after the end of treatment, and the period following the end of treatment can be an influencing factor in relapse among women. A further study shows that between 35% and 58% of women with substance abuse problems relapsed within two weeks of treatment, while a study by Campbell and Ettore’s (2011) found that addicts relapsed within six months of completing treatment and being rehabilitated, with the main causes being their response to pressure and their being too self-reliant to control their own desires.

Wasif et al., (2011) in their study on former women addicts that have completed their treatment and rehabilitation process, utilizing the Adult Substance Use Survey (ASUS), found that former substance abusers were positively expected to relapse within six to twelve months. Most previous studies have not identified the post-treatment period in their studies, although this factor is very important in the evaluation of relapse among former addicts, especially women. Research has shown that women are more successful at avoiding relapses than men. A study by Walton, Blow, and Booth, (2001) did not find a significant difference between men and women in regards to relapse. Previous findings have found that women often seek help from others, while men seem more reticent. Ibrahim et al., (2012) found that the risk of relapse among addicts is high, especially those with unstable emotions, prone to anger, have interpersonal conflicts such as family problems, marital issues, and divorce. The risk of relapse among female addicts without familial support is not surprising, as they usually have no motivation to adhere to the drug addiction rehabilitation process.

Women involved in substance abuse face challenges in staying drug-free, such as a lack of motivation, low self-esteem, interpersonal conflict with others such as family members, the inability to sever relations with their drug-using network, and an environment that could disrupt the treatment process. Compared to their male counterparts, women participate more in family affairs, and face the potential of more problematic interactions with their family members. They are more prone to stress and would return to drug use for a semblance of peace of mind. Joshi and Rathore (2017) in their study reported that substance abuse has consistently been seen as a male issue, particularly in India. Generally, women who use drugs have been the target of special opprobrium in Indian culture but, despite this fact, studies on substance abuse in recent years have shown a major change in this regard with a significant rise in substance abuse by Indian women. Women with addiction issues are labelled as failures, unable to fulfil the aspirations and expectations of female moral principles. They also faced societal stigma, as their actions contradict what is expected of a good woman, in conduct and behaviour (Ayyagari et al., 1999). This situation then leads to relapse. However, in recent years, the number of substance abuse cases in reports demonstrates the increasing number of female addicts in India.

National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence (NCADD) has opted for a logical and open consideration on sexual orientation issues that contributes to substance abuse among women in India. Female addicts have experienced more symptoms of sickness and absence of pain than male substance abusers. Across societies and networks, the most critical natural factor that powers drinking in women was discovered to be domestic abuse, ill-treatment by a partner or by another close relative. Only a few studies showed that women turn to drug use to accompany their partner or companion and, subsequently became dependent on it. In the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (2017), the reason for the women began on the road to addiction due to influence by friends and companions.


Literature Review

The increased availability of drugs and the consequent drug abuse has been observed as a growing social problem in Malaysia. The increased availability of Opioid Agonist Therapy (OAT) has been observed as the first and foremost priority for the Malaysian Ministry of Health which provides government-funded free assistance for Malaysians in governmental selected medical clinics. In the present time, free methadone is being distributed among all the public clinics for harm reduction, comprising needle and syringe exchange programs in every state of Malaysia, but recent empirical shreds of evidence indicated that no statistics are available concerning women benefiting from OAT in the country, and that these programs proved to be inadequate as compared to the needs of the present. Wickersham et al., (2016) found that around 35% to 58% of women addicts relapsed within two weeks after treatment. Meanwhile, a study found that the period after treatment is an influencing factor in relapse among women. Another study by Wasif et al., (2011) also found that addicts relapsed within six months after the end of their treatment and rehabilitation period. It is due to their response to pressure and self-reliance to avoid drug use. This proves that drug users, even after following the treatment and rehabilitation process, still face a variety of psychological pressures such as desires, urges, signals, and thoughts of returning to drug use. This means the period before the inclination to relapse emerges varies and depends on the high-risk situations that they might encounter.

Best et al., (2010) in their study on former women addict that have completed their treatment and rehabilitation, utilizing the Adult Substance Use Survey (ASUS), found that former addicts positively expected to relapse within six to twelve months. This means the period for the inclination to relapse among addicts varies and depends on the high-risk situation that they might encounter However, most previous studies did not highlight the post-treatment period in their studies, although this factor is very significant in evaluating relapse among former addicts, especially women (Hughes, Wilsnack, & Kantor, 2016). Women were reported to be more successful in restraining themselves from relapsing compared to men (Sklar, Annis, & Turner, 1999). However, the fact that an increasing number of women are involved in drug abuse is very worrying, as women are an important national asset that should be optimally developed to allow them to actively and effectively contribute to national and societal development. This drug problem is a huge obstacle to the career development and progress for women. Therefore, identifying the relapse trigger among women addicts could not only prevent relapse, but also determine the key influences in their lives that drive them to relapse. This study aims to determine the factors influencing relapse among former women addicts. Women’s involvement in drug abuse not only affect other social issues such as the decline in morality, prostitution, and breakdown of marriages, but also the physical and mental well-being of these women.

Mohaddes et al., (2021) suggested that five themes correlate to the global theme of the antecedents of relapse of high risk. These themes are: craving for use, physical issues, mental stress, family factors, and social factors that might affect the patient’s treatment. Social support, self-efficacy, and situational perception are vital contributing factors that determine relapse among female addicts. Amat et al., (2020) found the risk factors of relapse are internal to the drug addicts: weak willpower, lack of personal interest, irritation, lack of religious support and prior knowledge, anger, and hatred. In addition, some external factors of relapse include insufficient family support, financial troubles, a weak peer circle, and social rejection. Furthermore, the influential role of social media and lack of proper living space after treatment are also major factors of relapse. A lack of family support and social rejection also majorly contribute to relapse. Therefore, identifying the relapse trigger among women addicts could not only prevent relapse, but also determine the key influences in their lives that drive them to relapse in the first place. This study aims to determine the factors influencing relapse among former women addicts.

The Situation of Women and Relapse in Malaysia

For decades, researchers have been addressing the growing issue of women and substance abuse in countries all over the world. More specifically, in countries such as Malaysia, substance abuse is the most chronic of social diseases. However, this is not merely a problem for under-developed or developing countries, but also in highly developed areas such as the United States of America and Hong Kong. According to the World Drug Report (2015), there are almost 27 million human beings worldwide that abuse drugs, and these statistics appear even more shocking when listed by country. In Malaysia, in the period 2010–2015, a total of 127,606 cases were registered and reported by the National Anti-Drug Agencies (NADA, 2015). Among these cases, the majority of addicts were men, but with the passage of time, changes in family patterns and societal pressures have had an impact on women too. In the recent statistical report published by NADA in 2019, a clearer image of substance use among women is presented. In 2010, there were 580 substance abuse cases of women, a figure that almost doubled to 1013 during by 2015. These statistics make it clear that the issue of substance abuse among women could not be ignored (Mustapha, Ahmad, & Harith, 2017).

Differences in Patterns of Relapse between Women and Men

Empirical evidence shows that the causes of addiction in different regions such as the United States, Australia, and Europe are the result of destructive psychiatric distress and that women tend to have a greater propensity to be attracted to substance use than men. Women seem to be more interested in consuming alcohol, marijuana, opioids, and cocaine for perceptions of beauty or any other reason and it is harder for a woman to renounce substance abuse than men (Joshi & Rathore, 2017). A study in Brazil showed that men tend to have a high consumption of polydrug intakes, such as marijuana and crack in comparison to women, while women tend to be more vulnerable to mental distress, high rates of drug consumption, and a higher probability of relapse after getting treatment (Guimaraes et al., 2017). Becker, McClellan, and Reed, (2017) proposed that a marginal difference has been found among sex and relapse. Women are more inclined toward addiction than men, and that relapse would be the most painful process for women. The authors found that gender differences not only depend upon biological characteristics, but also other sociocultural factors that are influential in patterns of substance abuse between genders. Relapse could be a complex procedure due to stigma, ongoing interpersonal violence, hurdles of treatment and commitment, and, above all, lack of family and social support to women. Moreover, Green (2006) suggested that women should be treated in primary care centres rather than mental care centres, because the latter contributes to poorer treatment as women are more likely to face multiple hardships while attempting to recover from their addiction. Women were shown to be better than men in treatment centres.

Women, Relapse, and Family Support

Family support helps a former substance abuser to maintain motivation and stop using drugs. A lack of familial support could also predict relapse among women due to emotional problems, lack of open communication, and lack of support from their spouses or partners. Sun, (2007) in her study found that interpersonal conflict with family members can become one of the relapse triggers. This statement is supported by many scholars researching substance abuse among women, which found that a large number of addicts face various psychosocial pressures, and they come from backgrounds with family problems and divorces (Brecht et al., 2004). Disharmony in familial relations, absence of good relations with partners, and life experience traumas have a deep psychological effect on women addicts. This situation becomes more complicated as women addicts are less prepared to combat any stress, and return to drugs to forget their stress. This then leads them to relapse (McHugh et al., 2018). The patterns of interactions between drug addicts and their respective family members can potentially affect their physical and emotional status. Interactions can either function as stimulus or inhibitors for addicts to fully recover from their negative behaviour. This positive form of interaction helps drug addicts to react better towards their environment thus helping them with the recovery process (Ghazalli et al., 2017).

Razali (2017) has discussed the significant and key role of family support in both lapsing and relapsing. Family support functions in both positive and negative ways in any former addict’s life transformation, which can be determined through the intensity of support provided to the addict by the family members. Other studies also indicated that building a positive relationship with a substance abuser not only helps him/her escape their situation, but also helps his/her personal growth, career planning, and enjoyment of a healthy lifestyle. Maehira et al., (2013), in their study found that women lacking familial support doubled the risk of relapse compared to males, even after the end of treatment and rehabilitation. Without familial support, women are unable to continue with stable lives due to their responsibilities towards their families and children. There are also women that sold themselves for money. This situation then builds up pressure, as they lacked the required support to continue on with their lives. However, women do have the right to search for a better life. Therefore, they require more support to change their lives for the better.

Lack of family support and poor communication among family members can lead to relapse among former addicts. Family support ensures the progression of recovery from drug abuse, while on the other hand, non-supportive attitude of the family can be the foremost reason for a former addict to relapse. Furthermore, the poor interaction among family members instils feelings of loneliness that tends to induce relapse in former drug users. We can therefore conclude that higher moral and emotional support can, directly and indirectly, increase motivation and instil confidence in the former addicts and help them to stay away from addiction and live a healthier and happier life (Daley, 2013).

Women, Relapse, and Social Support

A study by Khazaee et al., (2019) found that women addict face psychological burdens such as frustration, despair, and social pressure that leads to relapse. This study is consistent with Johnson et al., (2011), whereby women addict facing emotional issues such as depression are at a high risk of relapsing. The findings show that relapse is linked to peer influence. Parsai et al., (2009) also support this contention that friends and peers contribute to women behavior and attitude towards alcohol and marijuana consumption, as well as their interests in using drugs. Study by Mason and Windle (2001) found that peer and friend support are highly influential towards relapse among teenagers. Through interactions with fellow substance abusers, the individuals observe and pick up on behaviors and values that encourage drug use, although social support could also strongly affect the rehabilitation process. Any criticism and conflict might lead to an increase in the rate of relapse. In contrast, it has been observed there is no significant link between social support and relapse (Cosden et al., 1999). This study shows that prevention of drug use requires social support, and has a significant effect on relapse after the end of treatment and rehabilitation (Ellis et al., 2004). In addition, stigma still has a significant impact on a former substance abuse’s life.

Corrigan, Watson & Miller, (2000) state that women face great stigmatization and discrimination in society. Stigmatized individuals encounter social rejection, labelling, discrimination, and negative consequences such as being denied the right to work. Empirical evidence suggests that the only obstacle which can disturb the whole treatment process that is societal degradation. These stigmas can arise a sense of shame which can lead a former substance abuse to decide to live in isolation (Corrigan, Kuwabara, & Shaughnessy, 2009). Beals, Peplau dan Gable, (2009) in their study reported that respondents report that drug addicts feel themselves unable to answer societal accusations and stigma, and insults by members of society discourages them from participating in normal activities. On the other hand, former addicts with a high level of social support tend to move toward positive lifestyle change and away from drug use. This support could be provided by their peer group and their environment.

Women, Relapse and Motivation

Motivation can help female former addicts to avoid relapse as they require internal support in order to be motivated in the process of making changes for a better life. A study by Haeffel and Vargas (2011) found that downturn was caused by various negative life outcomes; for example, loss of help and understanding, losing love or acknowledgment by others, stress and disappointment that could lead to hopelessness. National Health and Morbidity Survey (2015) directed by the Ministry of Health Malaysia, identified sorrow as a psychological well-being issue that individuals aged 16 and above experience most of the time. Immediate negative life occasions have been discovered as a strong danger factor for the advancement of onerous side effects. Shojaee and French (2014) expressed that at any one time, 10% of juvenile experience the ill effects of unpleasant and depression. Negative occasions, and inner trustworthiness overall reasons are the more prominent likelihood of setting up sadness. Delivered sadness because of discouragement prompts terrible mental self-portrait and feeling of useless rise the sentiments of demotivation towards standardization and it diminishes the motivation recovery (Liu et al., 2015; Yusoff, Ibrahim, & Ahmad, 2020).

Furthermore, according to a study by Jackson et al., (2020), women with complex behavioral and social challenges require longer-term intensive support in program relapse, particularly contingent incentives, and more frequent counselling, which could provide positive reinforcement and be well-positioned to motivate women during challenging circumstances when the risk of relapse is high. For instance, a study by Oveisi et al., (2020) looked into the effectiveness of motivational interviewing for 60 women in drug treatment programs in Iran. According to the findings, motivational interviewing can reduce the urge and potential of relapse among female substance abusers. Motivational interviewing has the potential to improve the health of Iranian women. Addiction is frequently relapsing (the majority of the women had been in treatment numerous times) and is connected with a great deal of stigma and reluctance to change. Motivational interviewing may be especially beneficial in reducing substance misuse because it meets women where they are in the process of change (or cycling through phases of change), helps women resolve any ambivalence, and is non-judgmental and person-centered.

Women, Relapse, and Self Esteem

Women’s involvement in substance addiction is primarily due to a lack of willpower and low self-esteem. According to Chie et al., (2015), self-esteem is the most important component that influences relapse. Their findings suggest that drug addicts’ low self-esteem plays a role in relapse. The majority of drug addicts indicated they lacked the willpower to go through and endure the difficult attempt to escape relapse. The higher their self-esteem, the less they are affected by negative stressors and the less likely they are to relapse, which then reduces their quality of life (Gillani et al., 2020). Recovery from addiction requires addicts to reject temptation, and requires both internal and external solidarity to withstand the temptation to relapse. This condition might cause negative moods as they struggle to avoid the negative consequences if they succumb. Subsequently, the addicts who opt for methadone treatment need solidarity to prevent falling off the wagon. The drug addicts’ preparedness for methadone treatment assumes that they are mentally prepared to recover from their addiction (Ghani et al., 2017).

Substance abuse is principally a monetary and medical issue, which applies to an assortment of physical, mental, and social effects on both the addicts and their support network. The utilization of narcotics has a yearly predominance of 0.3% to 0.5% among the adult populace in Malaysia. Increased pressure, uneasiness, misery, psychosis, loss of control, and the ability to choose, and diminished self-esteem are among the mental reactions of the tendency to relapse. However, several physical, mental, and character qualities, for example, self-esteem, can also lead to backsliding. This finding is also consistent with Bandura’s (1997) self-efficacy theory, which claims that self-esteem is a key role in behavioral change because it is the first commitment to do something despite the barriers faced. As a result, the majority of current programs have prioritized the improvement of their clients’ self-esteem (Habibi et al., 2016). Bandura (1997) characterized self-esteem as one’s faith in his/her capacity to plan and find a way to prevail with regards to accomplishing a superior circumstance. Confidence is another urgent factor in substance abuse treatment and the desire to be treated. It creates sentiments of certainty and autonomy. High confidence is related to enhanced critical thinking aptitudes and higher capacity to investigate challenging circumstances.


Method

A cross-sectional study was conducted on patients with substance use disorders six months after treatment at the Cure & Care Rehabilitation Centre (CCRC) in Bachok, Kelantan. This rehabilitation centre is chosen because this CCRC is for women involved in substance abuse in Malaysia. According to the statistics published by the National Anti-Drug Agency (NADA) in 2019, 81 women with substance abuse were being treated at the CCRC. In this study, purposive random sampling was used to select the respondents. The purposive sampling technique is used in this study as the research sample is not selected randomly, but determined by the researcher through set criteria, and these criteria have to be met by the research samples. This means only the population that meets the criteria are chosen as research samples that could fulfil the research objectives. The researcher decides what needs to be known and sets out to find people who can and are willing to provide the information by virtue of knowledge or experience (Bernard, 2002; Lewis & Sheppard, 2006).

A total of 50 women addicts from diverse backgrounds were selected to participate in this study. The result was evaluated using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17.0. A Problem Recognition Questionnaire (PRQ) with a 24-item inventory was used to measure recognition of their substance abuse using a five-point Likert scale, as follows: always, 1; very often, 2; sometimes, 3; almost never, 4; and never, 5. Perceived Social Support (PSS) is used to assess perceived social support from family and friends respectively, using a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). In this study, the 10-item version of the PSS has Cronbach’s alpha values of 0.81 and 0.76 for the PSS-FA and PSS-FR subscales respectively. The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE) was developed by Rosenberg (1965) for the self-evaluation of positive and negative feelings in adolescents and adults. All items were assessed on a four -point Likert scale from 1 (strongly agree) to 4 (strongly disagree). In this Malay version, the Cronbach alpha coefficient was between 0.70 and 0.88, whereas the reliability and validity coefficients were estimated at 0.82 and 0.85, respectively.

Pearson’s correlation and regression analysis was used as the data analysis technique in this study and Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to describe the strength and direction of the relationship between each independent variable and the dependent variable (Pallant, 2011). Meanwhile, the regression analysis was applied to test the hypotheses of this study. This technique is a powerful tool designed to explore and analyse the relationship between a single dependent variable and several independent variables. It is important to know that when the case involves an independent variable, the technique here is called simple regression. However, if it is more than one independent variable, the technique is known as multiple regression (Pallant, 2011). Multiple regressions were applied to assess the effect of factors such as family, friend support, motivation, and self-esteem on relapse


Results

Socio-Demographic Characteristics

Table 1 reports the socio-demographic data for the group. The majority of respondents were women between the ages of 21 to 40 (84%); 48% were married, 46% did not earn a monthly income, 68% showed “not applicable” to the question of taking drugs after treatment, and 78% admitted to a temptation to relapse. Table 1 shows the demographic findings of the study participants.

Demographic Characteristics of the Study Participants(n = 50)

Correlation of Personal Factor and Interpersonal Factor with Relapse

As the Pearson correlation table indicates, there is a positive and significant relationship between family support and relapse (r = 0.183) and a positive and significant relationship between friend support and relapse (r = 0.009). We also see a significant, but negative relationship between motivation and relapse (r = 0.387) and between self-esteem and relapse (r = -0.035). Table 2 shows the relationship between personal and interpersonal factors and relapse.

Pearson Correlation Coefficients Between the Study Variables

Predictor of Relapse Score

As presented in Table 3, the results of the multiple regression analysis were done by considering a total relapse scores as dependent variables, with personal and interpersonal factors as independent variables. The results also show that the independent variables of motivation, self-esteem, family support, and friend support are significant. Table 3 shows the regression results for the study respondents.

The Results of Multiple Linear Regression of Relapse

Through this stepwise method, only significant independent variables are included in the regression model and selected as the main factors that influence the temptation to relapse. If a variable is significant, it is included in the regression equation This means the stepwise method selects the main predictor, followed by a second predictor, and so on. Based on Table 3, the stepwise regression analysis results show that the regression model is significant [F (5.921), p < 0.05)]. The results show family support (β = .348, t = 2.507, p = 0.030), friend support (β = -.286, t = -2.738, p = 0.40), motivation (β = .580, t = 2.050, p = 0.50), and self-esteem (β= .523, t = 3.659, p = 0.001) toward relapse was supported. It could be concluded that the temptation to relapse decreases with the corresponding increase in support from family and friends, motivation, and self-esteem.


Discussion

This study aims to determine the factors influencing relapse among former women addicts One important finding of the present study shows that both personal and interpersonal factors can lead to relapse. These findings are in accordance with previous studies (Greenfield et al., 2007; Walitzer & Dearing, 2006) which show low level of motivation among former addicts as contributing to relapse, especially in the early stages post-treatment. Consider the fact that most previous studies found that both men and women go through the same risk of relapse post-treatment and rehabilitation. Women are more likely to relapse compared to men due to the lack of motivation in addressing their drug problems (Martino et al., 2000; Goodwin, 2000). The reported difference between men and women are the factors related to relapse, the reports being that it happens without a clear motive, and is more related to negative effects such as physical and sexual abuse among women. Stigmatization, such as being labelled “addict” can have a lasting impact on their self-esteem. This is because women use the same problem-solving approaches in stressful situations, and women are more likely to either seek out social support, accept responsibility, or run away. According to the results, women face different barriers and obstacles compared to men. Women are more likely to relapse compared to men due to the lack of motivation in addressing their drug problem (Stotts et al., 2001).

Women require internal support in order to be motivated in the process of making changes for a better life (Dascal et al., 2020; Itai et al., 2019). Lack of motivation has been used to explain the failure of individuals to begin, continue, and succeed in treatment. Motivation can reduce the urge to use and the likelihood of using among women addicts. Motivation may be especially beneficial in reducing substance abuse and help women avoid relapse (Oveisi et al., 2020). As a result, women who use drugs require internal motivation to help them quit and move on to a better life. In addition, women are more inclined to seek social support from others to overcome their problems (Van Der Westhuizen, 2007).

The above findings show the contribution of the four predictive variables (family support, friend support, motivation, and self-esteem) toward relapse. The findings are in line with the correlation analysis results that show the relationship between these independent variables, which have both positive and negative relationships with relapse. This means the results of this study, i.e. the social support factor is the main predictive factor for the temptation to relapse, confirm the researchers’ findings. Furthermore, most previous studies show social support to be the main determinant of the temptation to relapse among substance abuse.

The regression results are also seen to support previous studies such as Campbell and Ettore (2011); Daley, (2013) and Maehira et al., (2013), which found family support allows addicts to accept positive changes in their healing process and build up their self-esteem. Had the family fail to provide support, the addicts would turn to other support systems that can address their needs. Family plays an effective role as the main support group in someone’s life. Women substance abuse with a supportive family can resist relapse, compared to those without family support. There are also issues related to social support to prevent relapse, with men being more inclined to receive more social support at home and work, while women are more inclined to be isolated from their friends in their decision to relapse. It is this situation that increases the risk of the temptation to relapse. Also, women with addiction problems suffer from a greater stigma compared to their male counterpart and when combined with a lack of social support, this means isolation and higher risk, and the healing process for women is lower than men (Feltenstein & Henderson, 2011).

Aside than family support, friend support is also seen as a predictive factor in the temptation to relapse among addicts. Women are more inclined to seek social support from others to overcome their problems (Van Der Westhuizen, 2007). This has been highlighted in previous studies such as Kopetz, and Kruglanski, (2011). which found that friends have an effect on the temptation to relapse among former addicts. Most of them are at risk of being influenced by their friends and join them in deviant behaviors. A study by Carver & Scheier, (2011) found that the friend factor shows a high predictor in individual involvement in the drug problem. They likely relapsed into drug use due to a feeling of failure and self-guilt. This shows friends play an important role in increasing the temptation to relapse among former substance abuse post-treatment. It has been shown that women are most likely to relapse into drug addiction (Kuhl, 1986).

As an alternative, women might have a higher sensitivity towards stress or signals related to drugs, as relapse can be triggered by these variables. All these factors have been reported as being related to relapse in studies among male and women addicts trying to quit. Some studies confirmed the effectiveness of self-esteem and motivation in reducing the temptation to relapse among drug addicts; similar studies are also suggested in regards to relapse cases in Malaysia (Ibrahim et al., 2012; Ghani et al., 2017 & Mohd Ghazalli et al., 2017). The motivation concept has been instilled to explain why people do what they do, and what drives an individual to shift from one behavior to another. They set their goal, identify a suitable method, and eliminate distractions and conflict. The results are similar to the findings by Carver, Scheier, & Weintraub (1989) and Greenfield et al., (2007) that show women drug addicts have a higher motivation to report their efforts to restrain themselves from relapsing. In addition, compared to men, women report a higher level of motivation, preventing them from relapsing. The present study shows that self-esteem could improve the motivation to prevent relapse.

This finding is in line with the results of a study by Becker and Hu (2008). Moreover, the results of the present study show that lower self-esteem can lead to relapse, which is consistent with previous studies. According to various studies, self-esteem serves as a predictor of the inclination to relapse. This was acknowledged by Chie et al., (2015) and Gillani et al., (2020) in their studies. Their studies found that self-esteem is the most important component that influences relapse. Self-esteem may affect their cravings, like their expectation and belief in their ability to not relapse. Conversely, if they have a negative perception of drugs, they would try harder to keep themselves from relapsing.


Conclusion

In conclusion, personal and interpersonal factors are significant in determining the temptation to relapse among former CCRC substance abusers in Malaysia. Based on the findings, addicts in high-risk situations are more tempted to relapse, and they find it difficult to handle this situation. Women involved in drug problems face multiple pressures and high-risk situations and are more at risk of relapse. They need help from their family, friends, and important social support to ensure they could resist partaking in drugs again. Furthermore, policymakers should pay more attention to this issue. Their use of motivation and self-esteem to avoid this situation is at an average level. An improvement in their motivation and self-esteem could therefore help them resist relapses. Their use of motivation and self-esteem to avoid this situation is at an average level. Improving their motivation and self-esteem skills can help them to resist relapse. Besides, it is hoped that the results of the study will not only help provide input from women’s addiction experience to drug rehabilitation counsellors, but will also help drug rehabilitation institutions to strengthen the treatment and rehabilitation process more comprehensively, especially to women addicts who are undergoing drug treatment and rehabilitation programs in Malaysia. Moreover, the results of the study on the experience of substance abuse among women should provide new input to for rehabilitation institutions to design and make improvements to rehabilitation treatment modules for women’s substance abuse. The results of this study are also expected to provide specific awareness to family institutions about their important role in jointly assisting NADA in combating addiction and rehabilitating drug addicts, especially among women in Malaysia. The continued social support of families can help substance abuse continue to live healthy lifestyles, free from the influence of drugs, and help reduce the recidivism rate among substance abusers in Malaysia.

References

  • Addiction Center. (2019). The differences in addiction between men and women. Retrived from https://www.addictioncenter.com/addiction/differences-men-women, /
  • Amat, M. A. C., Ahmad, J., Jailani, O., Jaafar, W. M. W., & Zaremohzzabieh, Z. (2020). Relapse among drug addicts in East Coast Malaysia: A qualitative study of risk factors. Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(12), 432–447. [https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i12/8337]
  • Ayyagari, S., Boles, S., Johnson, P., & Kleber, H. (1999). Difficulties in recruiting pregnant substance abusing women into treatment: Problems encountered during the cocaine alternative treatment study. Health Services Research, 16, 80–81.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company.
  • Bashirian, S., Barati, M., Mohammadi, Y., Zarnagh, H. G., & Bagheri, S. (2021). Predictors of drug abuse relapse for iranian addicted women: an application of social cognitive theory. Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment. [https://doi.org/10.1097/ADT.0000000000000249]
  • Beals, K. P., Peplau, L. A., & Gable, S. L. (2009). Stigma management and well-being: The role of perceived social support, emotional processing, and suppression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 867–879. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209334783]
  • Becker, J. B., & Hu, M. (2008). Sex differences in drug abuse. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 29(1), 36–47. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2007.07.003]
  • Becker, J. B., McClellan, M. L., & Reed, B. G. (2017). Sex differences, gender, and addiction. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 95(1–2), 136–147. [https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.23963]
  • Best, D., Groshkova, T., Loaring, J., Ghufran, S., Day. E., & Taylor, A. (2010). Comparing the Addiction Careers of Heroin and Alcohol Users and Their Self-Reported Reasons for Achieving Abstinence. Journal of Groups in Addiction & Recovery, 5(3–4), 289–305. [https://doi.org/10.1080/1556035X.2010.523364]
  • Brecht, M. L., O’Brien, A., Von Mayrhauser, C., & Anglin, M. D. (2004). Methamphetamine use behaviors and gender differences. Addictive Behavior, 29(1), 89–106. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4603(03)00082-0]
  • Campbell, N., & Ettore, E. (2011). Gendering addiction: The politics of drug treatment in a neurochemical world. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. [https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230314245]
  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2011). The self-attention-induced feedback loop and social facilitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 545–568. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(81)90039-1]
  • Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267–283. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267]
  • Chie, Q. T., Tam, C. L., Bonn, G., Wong, C. P., Dang, H. M., & Khairuddin, R. (2015). Drug abuse, relapse, and prevention education in Malaysia: Perspective of university students through a mixed methods approach. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 6, 1–13. [https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00065]
  • Chii, C. Y., Seok, C. B., & Sombuling, A. (2017). Perceived Social Support and Global self-worth in Adolescence. Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, 31(1), 40–46.
  • Corrigan, P., River, L., Lundin, R., Wasowski, K., Campion, J., Mathisen, J., Goldstein, H., Bergman, M., Gagnon, C., & Kubiak, M. (2000). Stigmatizing attributions about mental illness. Journal of Community Psychology, 28(1), 91–102. [https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(200001)28:1<91::AID-JCOP9>3.0.CO;2-M]
  • Corrigan, P. W., Kuwabara, S. A., & O’ Shaughnessy, J. (2009). The public stigma of mental illness and drug addiction: Findings from a stratified random sample. Journal of Social Work, 9(2), 139–147. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017308101818]
  • Cosden, M., & Cortez-Ison, E. (1999). Sexual abuse, parental bonding, social support, and program retention for women in substance abuse treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 16, 149–155. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-5472(98)00043-9]
  • Daley, D. C. (2013). Family and social aspects of substance use disorders and treatment. The Journal of Food and Drug Analysis, 21(4), 73–76. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfda.2013.09.038]
  • Dascal, M., Rusu, A., Onisor, A., Blaga, O., Miller, M., & Meghea, C. (2020). A health intervention to prevent postnatal smoking relapse: The RESPREMO study protocol. Tobacco prevention & cessation, 6, 24–32. [https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/118724]
  • Ellis, B., Bernichon, T., Yu, P., Roberts, T., & Herrell, J. M. (2004). Effect of social support on substance abuse relapse in a residential treatment setting for women. Evaluation and Program Planning, 27(2), 213–221. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2004.01.011]
  • Feltenstein, M. W., Henderson, A. R., & See, R. E. (2011). Enhancement of cue-induced reinstatement of cocaine-seeking in rats by yohimbine: Sex differences and the role of the estrous cycle. Psychopharmacology, 216(1), 53–62. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-011-2187-6]
  • Ghani, N. A., Ghazalli, F. S. M., Abdullah, B., Mohd, Z., & Yunus, A. M. (2017). Addicts’ expectations and hopes towards their family during drug rehabilitation. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(12), 531–536. [https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i12/3634]
  • Gillani, M. K. U. H., Mukhtar, M., & Anwar, R. M. H. (2020). Self-esteem with quality of life among addicted and non-addicted adolescents. Rawal Medical Journal, 45(4), 894–897.
  • Goodwin, D. W. (2000). Alcoholism: The facts (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Green, C. A. (2006). Gender and use of substance abuse treatment services. Alcohol Research & Health, 29(1), 55–62.
  • Greenfield, S. F., Brooks, A. J., Gordon, S. M., Green, C. A., Kropp, F., McHugh, R. K., Lincoln, M., Hien, D., & Miele G. M. (2007). Substance abuse treatment entry, retention, and outcome in women: A review of the literature. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 86(1), 1–21. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.05.012]
  • Guimaraes, R. A., de Castro, V. D. O. L., Stabile, A. C., Motta-Castro, A. R. C., dos Santos Carneiro, M. A., Araujo, L. A., & Teles, S. A. (2017). Gender differences in patterns of drug use and sexual risky behavior among crack cocaine users in Central Brazil. BMC Psychiatry, 17(1), 412–420. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1569-7]
  • Habibi, R., Nasrabadi, A. N., Hamedan, M. S., & Moqadam, A. S. (2016). The effects of family-centered problem-solving education on relapse rate, self-efficacy, and self-esteem among substance abusers. International Journal of High-Risk Behaviors & Addiction, 5(1), 1–16. [https://doi.org/10.5812/ijhrba.24421]
  • Haeffel, G. J., & Vargas, I. (2011). Resilience to depressive symptoms: The buffering effects of enhancing cognitive style and positive life events. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 42(1), 13–18. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.09.003]
  • Hughes, T. L., Wilsnack, S. C., & Kantor, L. W. (2016). The influence of gender and sexual orientation on alcohol use and alcohol-related problems: Toward a global perspective. Alcohol Research Current Reviews, 38(1), 121–132.
  • Ibrahim, F., & Kumar, N. (2009). The influence of community on relapse addiction to drug use: Evidence from Malaysia. European Journal of Social Sciences, 11(3), 471–476.
  • Ibrahim, F., Abu Samah, B., Abu Talib, M., & Sabran, M. S. (2012). Penagih dadah dan keadaan berisiko tinggi kembali relaps. [Drug addicts and the high-risk situations of relapse]. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(1), 38–49.
  • Itai, M., Sasaki, A., Mori, M., Tsuda, S., & Matsumoto-Murakoso, A. (2019). The changing process of women’s smoking status triggered by pregnancy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(22), 4424–4438. [https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224424]
  • Jackson, M. A., Brown, A. L., Baker, A. L., Dunlop, A. J., Dunford, A., & Gould, G. S. (2020). Intensive behavioural and pharmacological treatment for tobacco dependence in pregnant women with complex psychosocial challenges: a case report. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(13), 4770–4478. [https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134770]
  • Johnson, J. E., O’Leary, C. C., Striley, C. W., Abdallah, A. B., Bradford, S., & Cottler, L. B. (2011). Effects of major depression on crack use and arrests among women in drug court. Addiction, 106(7), 1279–1286. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03389.x]
  • Joshi, D., & Rathore, B. S. (2017). Women substance abuse a rising problem in India. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 4(3), 9–20.
  • Khazaee-Pool, M., Pashaei, T., Nouri, R., Taymoori, P., & Ponnet, K. (2019). Understanding the relapse process: exploring Iranian women’s substance use experiences. Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 14(1), 1–11. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-019-0216-3]
  • Kopetz, C., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2011). Motivation and self-regulation in addiction: a call for convergence. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(1), 3–24. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612457575]
  • Kuhl, J. (1986). Motivation and information processing: A new look at decision making, dynamic change, and action control. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 404–434). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Liu, R. T., Kleiman, E. M., Nestor, B. A., & Cheek, S. M. (2015). The hopelessness theory of depression: A quarter-century in review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 22(4), 345–365. [https://doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12125]
  • Maehira, Y., Chowdhury, E. I., Reza, M., Drahozal, R., Gayen, T. K., & Masud, I. (2013). Factors associated with relapse into drug use among male and female attendees of a three-month drug detoxification–rehabilitation programme in Dhaka, Bangladesh: a prospective cohort study. Harm Reduction Journal, 10(1), 14–27. [https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7517-10-14]
  • Martino, S., Carroll, K. M., O’Malley, S. S., & Rounsaville, B. J. (2000). Motivational interviewing with psychiatrically ill substance abusing patients. American Journal on Addiction, 9(1), 88–91. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10550490050172263]
  • Mason, W. A., & Windle, M. (2001). Family, religious, school and peer influences on adolescent alcohol use: A longitudinal study. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62(1), 44–62. [https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2001.62.44]
  • McHugh, R. K., Votaw, V. R., Sugarman, D. E., & Greenfield, S. F. (2018). Sex and gender differences in substance use disorders. Clinical Psychology Review, 66, 12–23. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2017.10.012]
  • Mohaddes, H. Z., Shahidi, S. H., Heidari, M., Imani, S., & Ghahari, S. H. (2021). Causes of lapse and relapse of opioid use: a qualitative study of high-risk situations in Iranian women. Journal of North Khorasan Medical Sciences, 13(1), 43–52.
  • Mohd Ghazalli, F. S., Ghani, N. A., Abdullah, B., Wan Chik, W. M. Y., Engku Ali, E. M. T., Zulkifli Mohd., & Syed Abd. Rahman, S. M. A. (2017). Patterns of interactions between family members and drug addicts. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(4), 303–312. [https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i4/2807]
  • Mustapha, S. Z., Ahmad, Y., & Harith, N. H. M. (2017). Women and drug abuse in Malaysia: A marginalized client of drugs treatment and rehabilitation. International Journal for Studies on Children, Women, the Elderly and Persons with Disabilities, 1(6), 40–44.
  • National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Institute for Public Health, (2015). National Health and Morbidity Survey. (2015). Vol. II: Non-Communicable Diseases, Risk Factors & Other Health Problems. Retrieved from https://www.moh.gov.my/moh/resources/nhmsreport2015vol2.pdf
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. (2016). Alcohol Alert, No. 67, “Underage Drinking,” 2006. Retrieved from https://pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/ AA67/AA67.pdf
  • National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Substance Abuse and Mental Service Administration. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. RTI International. (2017) https://nsduhweb.rti.org/respweb/homepage.cfm
  • Oveisi, S. L., Stein, A. R., Babaeepour, E., & Araban, M. (2020). The impact of motivational interviewing on relapse to substance use among women in Iran: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Psychiatry, 20(1), 157–164. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02561-9]
  • Pallant, J. (2011). Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using the SPSS program. (4th ed.). Berkshire, UK: Allen & Unwin.
  • Parsai, M., Voisine, S., Marsiglia, F. F., Kulis, S., & Nieri, T. (2009). The protective and risk effects of parents and peers on substance use, attitudes, and behaviors of Mexican and Mexican American female and male adolescents. Youth & Society, 40(3), 353–376. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X08318117]
  • Razali, A. (2017). Personal and interpersonal factors with the inclination to relapse. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik, 30(3), 310–321. [https://doi.org/10.20473/mkp.V30I32017.310-321]
  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. [https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400876136]
  • Shojaee, M., & French, C. (2014). The relationship between mental health components and locus of control in youth. Psychology, 5(8), 966–978. [https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.58107]
  • Sklar, S. M., Annis, H. M., & Turner, N. E. (1999). Group comparisons of coping self-efficacy between alcohol and cocaine abusers seeking treatment. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 13, 123–133. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-164X.13.2.123]
  • Stotts, A. L., Schmitz, J. M., Rhoades, H. M., & Grabowski, J. (2001). Motivational interviewing with cocaine-dependent patients: A pilot study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 858–862. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.69.5.858]
  • Sun, A. P. (2006). Program factors related to women’s substance abuse treatment retention and other outcomes: A review and critique. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 30(1), 1–20. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2005.07.002]
  • Van der Westhuizen, M. A. (2007). Relapsing after treatment: Exploring the experiences of chemically addicted adolescents (unpublished master’s thesis). Department of Social Work, University of South Africa, Pretoria.
  • Walitzer, K. S., & Dearing, R. L. (2006). Gender differences in alcohol and substance use relapse. Clinical Psychology Review, 26(2), 128–148. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2005.11.003]
  • Walton, M. A., Blow, F., & Booth, B. M. (2001). Diversity in relapse prevention needs: Gender and race comparisons among substance abuse treatment patients. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 27, 225–240. [https://doi.org/10.1081/ADA-100103707]
  • Wasif, S., Azhar, S., Oktavia, Y., Usman, S., Uzbek, H., & Athar, Y. (2011). Rehabilitation model to prevent relapse among drug users in health system. International Journal of Pharmacy & Life Sciences, 2(5), 717–722.
  • Wickersham, J. A., Loeliger, K. B., Marcus, R., Pillai, V., Kamarulzaman, A., & Altice, F. L. (2016). Patterns of substance use and correlates of lifetime and active injection drug use among women in Malaysia. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 42(1), 98–110. [https://doi.org/10.3109/00952990.2015.1101467]
  • World Drug Report (2015) (United Nations publication, Sales No. E.15.XI.6).
  • Yusoff, N., Ibrahim, N., & Ahmad, N. (2020). Negative life events, resilience, and depression among moral rehabilitation center students’ of Sekolah Tunas Bakti in Malaysia. International Journal of Health Sciences and Research, 10(3), 1–10.

Biographical Note: Asbah Razali is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Anthropology and Sociology, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Her research interests include developmental psychology, drugs, relapse, and adolescent and psychosocial problems. Email: asbahrazali@um.edu.my

Biographical Note: Zainal Madon is an Associate Professor in the Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Faculty of Human Ecology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor. His research and professional experience include basic advising and counseling, career guidance & advising, the cognition, language, and psychopathology of children and family. Email: zainalm@upm.edu.my

Biographical Note: Mohammed Salah Hassan is a PhD graduate in the Department of Administrative Studies and Politics, Faculty of Economics and Administration, UniversitiMalaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. His research interests include risk perception, self-efficacy, and public policy. E-mail: sala142@yahoo.com

Table 1

Demographic Characteristics of the Study Participants(n = 50)

Variables Frequency Percentage
Age
20 years and below 3 6.0
21–40 years 42 84.0
40 years and above 5 10.0
Marital Status
Single 6 12.0
Married 24 48.0
Widowed/Divorced 20 40.0
Income
RM500 and below 7 14.0
RM500 - RM1000 11 22.0
RM1000 - RM1500 6 12.0
RM1500 and above 3 6.0
No income 23 46.0
Drug Use Post-treatment
Yes 34 68.0
No 16 32.0
Length of Time to First Post-treatment Drug Use
Not applicable 34 68.0
Less than one month 3 6.0
1–3 months 3 6.0
3–6 months 3 6.0
6–9 months 2 4.0
9 months and beyond 5 10.0
Temptation to Relapse
Yes 39 78.0
No 11 22.0

Table 2

Pearson Correlation Coefficients Between the Study Variables

Variables Y X1 X2 X3 X4
Note. **p value = 0.00
Y (Relapse) 1
X1 Family Support 0.183** 1
X2 Friend Support 0.009** 0.573** 1
X3 Motivation -0.038** 0.428** .204** 1
X4 Self Esteem -0.035** 0.341* .335** .170** 1

Table 3

The Results of Multiple Linear Regression of Relapse

Unstandardized
Coefficients
Standardized
Coefficients
Collinearity
Statistics
Note. R2 = 0.705, F = 5.921, p = 0.00
Variables B Std. Error Beta T Sig. Tolerance VIF
Family Support .348 .231 .419 2.507 .030 .407 2.456
Friend Support -.286 .251 .189 -2.738 .040 .369 2.710
Motivation .580 .288 .608 2.050 .050 .246 4.061
Self Esteem .523 .143 .598 3.659 .001 .517 1.935