Exploring the Reflection of Teachers to Encourage the Gender Equality for Girls in Punjab Schools: in the Light of Universal Right to an Education1

Introduction

The foundation of education for women is rooted in fundamental values such as human rights, equality, and the advancement and prosperity of entire societies. Ensuring universal access to high-quality education for girls and young women is a fundamental human right, a top priority for global development, and a strategic objective for the World Bank (Rao, Umayahara, Yang, & Ranganathan, 2021). According to Tyagi, Vishwakarma, Rishi, and Rajiah (2020), the education of women extends beyond mere enrollment. It further encompasses guaranteeing that young women have the chance to complete all levels of education, thereby equipping themselves with the knowledge and abilities to compete in the labor market, acquire the socio-emotional and life skills essential for navigating and adapting to an ever-changing world, exercise autonomy in decision-making regarding their personal lives; and make meaningful contributions to their communities and the global community (Whipple & Dimitrova‐Grajzl, 2021).

Women education is understood to be crucial for intergenerational knowledge transmission, gender equality, and social change and is explicitly linked to development outcomes (Hakiem, 2022). As an acknowledged fundamental human right, education is also extended to women. Implementing mandatory education for women serve to protect their entitlement to education and aids in the dismantling of gender-based prejudices and discrimination (Iddy, 2021). Girls’ education is integral to the progress of societies as a whole. women who receive an education make significant contributions to the labor force, engage in economic endeavors, and assume critical positions in advancing their communities and countries on a social and economic level (S. G. Smith & Sinkford, 2022).

By Islam and Hoque (2022) Educated women will likely be able to break free from the cycle of destitution. Girls who choose to attend school do so because it equips them with the knowledge and abilities necessary to obtain better employment opportunities, thereby improving their families and economic circumstances. The relationship between education and health outcomes is favorable. Providing health, hygiene, and nutrition education to women through compulsory education fosters the development of healthier lifestyles and improves their overall well-being (Parsons, Houge Mackenzie, Filep, & Brymer, 2020). Girls are empowered through education because it equips them with the knowledge and skills necessary to make well-informed life choices. This facilitates their domestic and international decision-making, promoting a sense of empowerment and agency (Montes et al., 2022).

A correlation exists between mandatory education for women and reduced rates of fertility. Girls who acquire an education are more inclined to postpone marriage and procreation, facilitating population control and allowing them to strategize their family formation (Masuda & Yamauchi, 2020). Education contributes to the prevention of gender-based violence. Girls’ compulsory education aids in the development of skills to identify and resist various forms of violence, as well as raises awareness of their rights (Dadvand & Cahill, 2021).

Girls’ mandatory education catalyzes enhanced political engagement and leadership potential. Women that has received a formal education is associated with greater participation in civic duties, advocacy for rights, and leadership positions in both communities and countries. Girls’ access to opportunities may be constrained by cultural and social norms confronted and altered by compulsory education (Carey, Akiva, Abdellatif, & Daughtry, 2021). It fosters a more equitable and inclusive society by dismantling conventional gender roles and stereotypes. Although there may be variations in the provisions of compulsory education policies among nations, their fundamental goal remains the same: to guarantee equitable access to education for women, thereby enabling them to lead gratifying lives and make significant contributions to the progress of their communities (Sharma, 2020).

Theoretical Framework

The foundation of the theoretical framework advocating for girls’ education is a multitude of perspectives and principles that emphasize the significance of educating and empowering young women (Dover, 2013; Unterhalter et al., 2014). Diverse conceptualizations of quality are influenced by broader theoretical frameworks and paradigms of development, which may or may not incorporate a theoretically consistent treatment of gender (Collins & Stockton, 2018). Becker argued in the 1960s that the benefit of additional education for women could be measured by family earnings rather than individual earnings, given the low labor force participation rate among women, particularly after marriage (Bandelj & Spiegel, 2023). Feminist theory seeks to comprehend the origins and mechanisms of gender inequality in education, as well as the consequences on society. Similar to numerous other societal institutions, educational systems exhibit a notable lack of equity in terms of treatment and opportunities for women (Bensimon & Marshall, 2020; O'Connor, 2020).

However it was appended to the outset of Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Women, in which provided a foundational outline of the subsequent arguments and offered cogent justifications emphasizing the critical nature of women’s education (Wolloch, 2022). Critical feminist pedagogy investigates how various attributes such as ability, race, class, gender, sexual orientation, and social class intersect and contribute to patriarchal systems of knowledge and oppression. These systems include those that support the academic establishment and conventional pedagogical practices (Busse, Krausch, & Liao, 2021; Cannizzo, 2021; Grissom-Broughton, 2020). Using Marxist-feminist analysis, we contend that education/learning is only one facet of prosperity, justice, equality, democracy, and peace in complex social relations of power (Sousa, 2021) .

Figure 1.

Theoretical Approach by Unterhalter et al. (2014)

Review of Literature

Education is a crucial element in the progress and advancement of society. It serves as a means to acquire knowledge and enhance abilities and promotes gender equality and consciousness. Numerous organizations and scholars have approached this issue from their vantage point, but reformation is still necessary. An exhaustive examination of the existing body of literature can yield valuable insights regarding the present condition of girls’ education in the area, shed light on obstacles that may be encountered, and identify possible interventions (Hinkelman, 2004). What is currently understood about the effect investing in women’s education has on gender equality, women’s empowerment, and women’s well-being are examined in this section through a review of empirical literature from various social science and health disciplines.

According to previous research women attain elevated levels of self-esteem when they understand and are confident in their talents, capabilities, and passions. These studies analyze several essential components for fostering self-esteem in young women and provides evidence that violence against women can potentially be effectively mitigated by questioning gender stereotypes (Bligh, Schlehofer, Casad, & Gaffney, 2012; Hayhurst, 2013).

Additional studies elucidate the critical nature of women-only self-defense courses, which aim to challenge conventional gender-role socialization and empower women with the belief that they possess the ability and entitlement to protect themselves (Elise Radina, 2017). Like, self-defense courses empower women by teaching them practical techniques for physical defense, situational awareness, and mental preparedness. These courses build confidence, helping women to assert boundaries and respond effectively in threatening situations. Additionally, they provide a supportive environment where women can learn to protect themselves while fostering a sense of community and empowerment. Moreover, invoking embodied conceptions of resistance in the context of a martial arts-based sport, gender and development program, this paper also draws on research on gender-based and sexual violence that indicates self-defense training can actively alter gender stereotypes, allowing men (and other women) to perceive women as self-reliant, powerful, and capable (Hayhurst, 2014).

The initial assessment of Punjab Education Sector Reforms program’s impact was carried out by the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) in 2006 (Chaudhury & Parajuli, 2010), and assessed the effects of Punjab Education Sector Reforms Program on primary rate enrollment and discovered that both gross and net primary enrollment rates in Punjab province improved significantly (Tajammal, Arun, & Pourmehdi, 2023). Research examining the Generalized System of Preference effects on adolescent girls’ academic achievements has revealed that the program has a moderately negative effect on the girls’ academic development and completion of middle school (Alam, Baez, & Del Carpio, 2011).

Furthermore, immediate benefits include increased enrollment in various grades throughout middle school and a greater probability of successfully transferring to high school and completing at least one grade (Francis & Darity, 2021). Guglielmi et al. (2021) stated that the primary objective is to utilize this evidence to guide programming during times of crisis and assist a wide range of stakeholders in minimizing the adverse effects of emergencies on the education of women.

Exploring the barriers to women’s education reveals numerous challenges highlighted in previous studies. These include a lack of support for women’s education (Munro, Hunter, Hossain, & Keep, 2021), issues like child marriage and adolescent pregnancy (Baba, Yendork, & Atindanbila, 2020), and insufficient data on the benefits of education (Reuge et al., 2021). Additional hurdles involve gender-based violence in schools (Geppert, Shah, & Hirsch, 2023), a lack of gender sensitivity in the classroom (Park & Kim, 2020), the absence of secure environments and supportive relationships (Kuss, Kristensen, Williams, & Lopez-Fernandez, 2022), inadequate instructional materials (Ng, 2022), and insufficient academic assistance (Dong, Xu, Chai, & Zhai, 2020).

Other significant obstacles include inadequate menstrual hygiene management (Sommer et al., 2021), limited health and caregiving services (Donelan, Falik, & DesRoches, 2001), and a lack of life skills education (Psaki, Haberland, Mensch, Woyczynski, & Chuang, 2022). Women also face barriers such as insufficient sports programs (Staurowsky et al., 2020), water and sanitation deficiencies (Assefa et al., 2021), and limited access to education (Guglielmi et al., 2021). Additional issues include a deficient policy and legal framework (Psaki et al., 2022), financial constraints on covering tuition and fees (Arar, 2021), the inability to purchase academic materials (Tomczyk & Walker, 2021), and food insufficiency (Villegas, Peirolo, Rocca, Ipince, & Bakrania, 2021).

Another study compared girl-specific interventions to general interventions to determine which programs are most effective for facilitating girls’ access to education and learning. It was determined that interventions targeting both girls and boys improved access and learning to the same extent as those targeting only girls (Dyke et al., 2021). As noted by the authors, eliminating gender-based obstacles could enhance girls’ educational experiences and yield further enduring advantages, which could extend to men as well. In contrast to previous evaluations, this systematic assessment investigates a wide range of obstacles to determine which policies and interventions specifically target gender-related barriers to girls’ education to enhance academic achievement and school engagement successfully. Therefore, based on the literature review five hypotheses were formulated such as:

• a) Distance from school has a negative effect on fulfilling the Universal Right to Education.
• b) Lack of educational institution has a negative effect on fulfilling the Universal Right to Education.
• c) Lack of finance effect has a negative effect on fulfilling the Universal Right to Education.
• d) Lack of women teachers has a negative effect on fulfilling the Universal Right to Education.
• e) Lack of school facility has a negative effect on fulfilling the Universal Right to Education.

Methodology

The study was conducted using a quantitative survey approach. According to Stockemer, Stockemer, and Glaeser (2019), the survey technique entails gathering data from a representative sample of persons through their responses to questions. This method encompasses several stages, one of which is the collection and analysis of quantitative data (Maqbool et al., 2023). The provided data is employed to examine hypotheses about the perceptions of teachers regarding the promotion of gender equality in girls’ schools in Punjab, in consideration of the universal right to education.

The participants in this study are teachers from primary to higher secondary schools. The results of a comprehensive investigation involving 314 teachers who were utilized as the sample. They were all teachers at schools in Multan, Punjab, Pakistan. A convenience sampling strategy was employed to identify the participants for this study.

In addition to survey questionnaires, teachers were extended an invitation letter to partake in the study. The document comprised essential elements of the research and provided comprehensive guidelines for effectively completing the survey questionnaire. Teachers signed consent forms and participated voluntarily after obtaining permission from their respective head masters. The participants were granted the assurance that their personal information would be treated with the utmost confidentiality. Additionally, they were advised of their prerogative to disengage from the study before the analysis phase.

A questionnaire was devised to evaluate the following factors: such as Distance of school (DS), Lack of educational institution (LEI), Lack of finance (LF), Lack of women teachers (LWT), Lack of school facility (LSF), and Universal Rights (UR). The participant responses were evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale with five levels of agreement, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly Agree), and the total questionnaire contained 23 statements. However, Cronbach’s alpha was computed to assess the survey questionnaire’s dependability. The overall value of Cronbach’s alpha was 0.91 that indicated a valid questionnaire by the literature (Zafeer, Li, & Maqbool, 2023; Zafeer, Maqbool, & Yanping, 2022). Further, the researcher translated the questionnaire into Urdu, while the participants responded in their native languages to ensure optimal comprehension for the study. For data analysis, two statistical instruments and software were employed: Smart (PLS-SEM) and a Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS).

A comprehensive evaluation of the dataset was undertaken to ascertain its adherence to the specifications of the measurement model and its suitability for subsequent analysis. The initial stage of the evaluation procedure involved an examination of the loadings of the indicators. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is utilized for measurement model validation. Measurement models can assess various forms of validity (Baharum et al., 2023). Furthermore, PLS-SEM, or Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling, was applied to evaluate the concept. Small sample sizes and complex models are amenable to this technique (Rosak-Szyrocka & Tiwari, 2023). PLS-SEM is a two-step process for multivariate statistical analysis: initially, the measurement model is assessed, followed by the evaluation of the structural model utilizing SmartPLS 4.0. To guarantee the accuracy of the analysis, 10,000 bootstrap samples were employed.

Findings

The demographic characteristics of the participants, including gender, age, and type of school are summarized in Table 1. The analysis of these variables was conducted using frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation. The gender distribution indicates the inclusion of both males and females, with a mean of 1.60 and a standard deviation of 0.492. Participants’ ages were grouped into two categories: 20–25 years and 26–30 years, with a mean of 1.37 and a standard deviation of 0.483. The school types were categorized into public, private, and co-sector, with a mean of 1.73 and a standard deviation of 0.618.

Table 1

Participant Demographic Statistics

Analysis of the measurement model

The initial stage in establishing the dependability and accuracy of the measurement variables and preparing the groundwork for subsequent structural analysis is a Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Each hypothesis is examined for causal relationships between latent constructs, using PLS-SEM to test the results. Cronbach’s alpha (CA) and composite reliability (CR) were employed to evaluate the internal consistency and reliability of the measure. This choice was based on prior research suggesting that composite reliability (CR) estimates yield more precise reliability coefficients (Hair Jr, Howard, & Nitzl, 2020).

A convergent validity test was performed by calculating the average variance explained (AVE) for each construct across all items (Rönkkö & Cho, 2022), as presented in Table 2. The results demonstrate that all AVE values satisfy the minimum admissible threshold of 0.5, thus confirming convergence (Appiah-Twum & Long, 2023). Consequently, the values of the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) were implemented. A multicollinearity issue becomes apparent when the VIF values surpass 5. The greatest outer VIF value recorded was 3.057, which is within the permissible range according to the findings of Hur (2018).

Table 2

Factors Loading and Assessment of the Indicators

The path analysis model illustrates in figure 2 that it is necessary to eliminate measurement items that have a loading below 0.50. Previous studies indicated that each item loading should be greater than 0.50 (Maqbool, Zafeer, Zeng, et al., 2024; Yusif, Hafeez-Baig, Soar, & Teik, 2020), and the current investigation displayed a loading range that was greater than 0.50. The distance of schools varies between 0.895 and 0.700, the lack of educational institutions between 0.821 and 0.571, the lack of finance between 0.866 and 0.707, the lack of women teachers between 0.746 and 0.663, the lack of school facilities between 0.815 and 0.687, and universal rights between 0.789 and 0.670. The distance of school has the greatest factor loading, while the lack of educational institutions has the least.

Figure 2.

Measurement (Path Analysis) model

Using the Heterotrait-Monotrait (HTMT) method, the constructs’ discriminant validity was evaluated. The HTMT ratio should be less 0.85 (strictly speaking) or 0.90 (acceptable), according to the literature (Henseler, Ringle, & Sarstedt, 2015; Maqbool, Zafeer, Maqbool, et al., 2024). As shown in Table 3, all HTMT values fall below the threshold value of 0.90, providing further evidence that discriminant validity has been established. Additionally, once the measurement model’s reliability and validity have been confirmed, the next step is to build the structural model, look at possible lines of inquiry, and come up with testing hypotheses.

Table 3

Discriminant Validity of each Variable Using HTMT90 Criterion

Validation of hypotheses and structural models

Table 4 presents hypothesis testing through path analysis in which path coefficients, beta values, t-statistics, p-values, and f-squared were utilized to describe the indicators. UR followed the following orders of significance: DS (β = 0.054, t = 4.412, p < 0.000), LEI (β = 0.060, t = 4.195, p < 0.000), LF (β = 0.058, t = 3.967, p < 0.000), LFT (β = 0.056, t = 2.562, p < 0.010), and LSF (β = 0.052, t = 3.728, p < 0.000). It was discovered that the acceptance of each indicator had a substantial and noteworthy impact on the following universal rights-related indicators: distance of school, lack of educational institutions, lack of finance, lack of women teachers, and lack of school facility.

Table 4

Hypothesis Testing through Path Analysis

In figure 3 the findings of the study indicated that the lack of educational institutions and the distance of schools had the greatest impact on the universal rights of girls in the educational sectors of Punjab and Multan, Pakistan. The minimal effect of the lack of women educators in that region can be attributed to the lack of educational institutions. However, these findings suggest that by increasing the number of schools dedicated to girls’ education, the need for female teachers would rise. This increase would not only address the current shortage of female educators but also create a positive cycle where more girls are educated, leading to a greater pool of qualified women who can return to teach in their communities.

Figure 3.

Bootstrap image for Path Analysis

The measurement model (PLS-SEM) was established using partial least squares analysis. According to the research model, the data fit was adequate. It was possible to conclude that the final model was well-fitting, as all fit indices satisfied this factor. A satisfactory model was attained after undergoing multiple iterations (McNeish & Wolf, 2023). As shown in figure 3, the model that provided the best fit exhibited inter correlation among the scales, which corresponds to latent factors. Multiple metrics are employed to evaluate it, such as the Normed Fit Index (NFI), standardized root mean square residual (SRMR), and chi-square. The goodness of fit indices presented in Table 5, including SRMR = 0.074, Chi-square = 745.492, and NFI = 0.724, provide evidence that the final model is appropriately fitted.

Table 5

Goodness-of-Fit Indices

Discussion

The nuanced and intricate nature of the discourse about the responsibility of educators to advance gender equality in girls’ institutions in Punjab is evident (Khan, 2023). Given the recognition of the universal right to education, educators assume a pivotal role in altering perspectives, contesting preconceived notions, and actively fostering a more inclusive academic milieu (Polat & Çelik, 2023). However, the World Bank has also contributed by hosting a global, multidisciplinary symposium focused on gender, education, and development, aimed at reinvigorating initiatives to advance educational equity (Bergeron, 2003). Therefore, the present study explored the reflection of teacher for gender equality among women in Punjab institutions concerning the universal right to education. Teachers from primary to higher secondary institutions participated in the data collection process. Initially, five hypotheses were developed. Subsequently, the data were analyzed using various statistical methods, including SPSS and PLS-SEM.

This research has identified a diverse array of determinants that effect gender equality in girls’ institutions in Punjab. The distance to school, the lack of educational institutions, lack of finance, the lack of women teachers, and lack of school facilities all have a negative significant impact on girls’ education. Additionally the results revealed that the highest negative impact was the lack of educational institutions and distance from schools.

Furthermore it is essential to comprehend the underlying causes and put focused tactics into action. Ensuring that everyone has access to a high-quality education is one of the most important These should be included; giving girls financial aid and scholarships tactics for empowering women through education (Chan, Spaid Miedema, Naved, & Yount, 2023; Vaughan & Longlands, 2023). Collaboration between the foreign community, civil society organizations, and the government is also necessary to address gender inequities in education (E. C. Smith & Hamel, 2023). Governments ought to place a high priority on girls’ education by providing adequate funding, putting gender equality laws into place, upholding them, and keeping an eye on the results (Khoswe, 2023). The foreign community can offer financial and technical help, but civil society organizations can be vital in carrying out projects and programmers locally (Letsch, 2023).

Conclusions

In conclusion, Pakistan’s educational overall growth and advancement depend on resolving gender inequalities in education and enabling women to complete their education (Malik & Courtney, 2011). In Pakistan, the gender gap in education has long been a problem, with women having to overcome several obstacles to receive a good education. But lately, there have been initiatives to close this disparity and provide girls with more influence via education, and these initiatives have had encouraging outcomes. Regardless of gender, everyone has the fundamental right to education, which is essential for ending the cycle of poverty and promoting social and economic advancement. Girls with greater education are more likely to seek postsecondary education, get better jobs, and make contributions to the economy and communities. Pakistan has to launch several programs to overcome gender gaps in education. These steps should be taken, including providing financial aid and scholarships for girls, establishing all-girls schools and universities, promoting women educators, and implementing gender-sensitive curricula and instructional strategies. Furthermore, awareness campaigns and advocacy efforts should be organized to challenge traditional beliefs and attitudes, which can play a significant role in closing the gender gap in education.

References

• Alam, A., Baez, J. E., & Del Carpio, X. V. (2011). Does cash for school influence young women's behavior in the longer term? Evidence from Pakistan. Evidence from Pakistan (May 1, 2011). World Bank Policy Research Working Paper(5669). [https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5669]
• Ali, N., Ali, M. R. N., & Wajahat, M. J. (2021). Education in Pakistan: Are the Articles 25A and 37 (b) Closing the Gender Gap in KP Province? Research Journal of Social Sciences and Economics Review, 2(1), 30-35. [https://doi.org/10.36902/rjsser-vol2-iss1-2021(30-35)]
• Appiah-Twum, F., & Long, X. (2023). Human capital, trade competitiveness and environmental efficiency convergence across Asia Pacific countries. Environmental and Resource Economics, 1-24. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-023-00758-6]
• Arar, K. H. (2021). Research on refugees’ pathways to higher education since 2010: A systematic review. Review of Education, 9(3), e3303. [https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3303]
• Assefa, G. M., Sherif, S., Sluijs, J., Kuijpers, M., Chaka, T., Solomon, A., . . . Muluneh, M. D. (2021). Gender equality and social inclusion in relation to water, sanitation and hygiene in the Oromia region of Ethiopia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(8), 4281. [https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084281]
• Baba, H., Yendork, J. S., & Atindanbila, S. (2020). Exploring married girls’ subjective experiences of well-being and challenges. Journal of Adolescence, 79, 193-207. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.01.009]
• Baharum, H., Ismail, A., Awang, Z., McKenna, L., Ibrahim, R., Mohamed, Z., & Hassan, N. H. (2023). Validating an instrument for measuring newly graduated nurses’ adaptation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), 2860. [https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20042860]
• Bandelj, N., & Spiegel, M. (2023). Pricing the priceless child 2.0: children as human capital investment. Theory and Society, 52(5), 805-830. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-022-09508-x]
• Bensimon, E. M., & Marshall, C. (2020). Policy analysis for postsecondary education: Feminist and critical perspectives. In Feminist critical policy analysis II (pp. 1-22): Routledge. [https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003063117-1]
• Bergeron, S. (2003). The post-Washington consensus and economic representations of women in development at the World Bank. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 5(3), 397-419. [https://doi.org/10.1080/1461674032000122759]
• Bligh, M. C., Schlehofer, M. M., Casad, B. J., & Gaffney, A. M. (2012). Competent enough, but would you vote for her? Gender stereotypes and media influences on perceptions of women politicians. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(3), 560-597. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00781.x]
• Busse, E., Krausch, M., & Liao, W. (2021). How the “neutral” university makes critical feminist pedagogy impossible: Intersectional analysis from marginalized faculty on three campuses. Sociological Spectrum, 41(1), 29-52. [https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.2020.1850377]
• Cannizzo, H. A. (2021). Implementing feminist language pedagogy: Development of students’ critical consciousness and L2 writing. Education Sciences, 11(8), 393. [https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080393]
• Carey, R. L., Akiva, T., Abdellatif, H., & Daughtry, K. A. (2021). ‘And school won’t teach me that!’Urban youth activism programs as transformative sites for critical adolescent learning. Journal of Youth Studies, 24(7), 941-960. [https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2020.1784400]
• Chan, K., Spaid Miedema, S., Naved, R. T., & Yount, K. M. (2023). Beyond Girls’ Education: Pathways to Women’s Post-Marital Education in Matlab, Bangladesh. Feminist Economics, 29(1), 38-69. [https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2022.2082510]
• Chaudhury, N., & Parajuli, D. (2010). Conditional cash transfers and female schooling: the impact of the female school stipend programme on public school enrolments in Punjab, Pakistan. Applied Economics, 42(28), 3565-3583. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840802167376]
• Collins, C. S., & Stockton, C. M. (2018). The central role of theory in qualitative research. International journal of qualitative methods, 17(1), 1609406918797475. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918797475]
• Dadvand, B., & Cahill, H. (2021). Structures for care and silenced topics: accomplishing gender-based violence prevention education in a primary school. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 29(2), 299-313. [https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2020.1732449]
• Donelan, K., Falik, M., & DesRoches, C. M. (2001). Caregiving: Challenges and implications for women’s health. Women's Health Issues, 11(3), 185-200. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S1049-3867(01)00080-9]
• Dong, Y., Xu, C., Chai, C. S., & Zhai, X. (2020). Exploring the structural relationship among teachers’ technostress, technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK), computer self-efficacy and school support. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29, 147-157. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00461-5]
• Dover, A. G. (2013). Teaching for social justice: From conceptual frameworks to classroom practices. Multicultural perspectives, 15(1), 3-11. [https://doi.org/10.1080/15210960.2013.754285]
• Dyke, E., Pénicaud, S., Hatchard, J., Dawson, A.-M., Munishi, O., & Jalal, C. (2021). Girl-Powered Nutrition program: Key themes from a formative evaluation of a nutrition program co-designed and implemented by adolescent girls in low-and middle-income countries. Current Developments in Nutrition, 5(7), nzab083. [https://doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzab083]
• Elise Radina, M. (2017). Sisterhood and sexual assault: Engaging sorority members in dialogue, critical analysis, and feminist praxis. Family relations, 66(1), 126-138. [https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12234]
• Francis, D. V., & Darity, W. A. (2021). Separate and unequal under one roof: How the legacy of racialized tracking perpetuates within-school segregation. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 7(1), 187-202. [https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2021.7.1.11]
• Geppert, A. B., Shah, A. H., & Hirsch, J. S. (2023). “Hardly Able to Move, Much Less Open a Book”: A Systematic Review of the Impact of Sexual and Gender-Based Violence Victimization on Educational Trajectories. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15248380231173430. [https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380231173430]
• Grissom-Broughton, P. A. (2020). A matter of race and gender: An examination of an undergraduate music program through the lens of feminist pedagogy and Black feminist pedagogy. Research studies in music education, 42(2), 160-176. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X19863250]
• Guglielmi, S., Jones, N., Nicolai, S., Pereznieto, P., Plank, G., Vu, N., . . . Mackintosh, A. (2021). Reimagining Girls' Education: Solutions to Keep Girls Learning in Emergencies. UNICEF.
• Hair Jr, J. F., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101-110. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069]
• Hakiem, R. A. D. (2022). Advancement and subordination of women academics in Saudi Arabia’s higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(5), 1528-1541. [https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1933394]
• Halai, A., & Durrani, N. (2021). School education system in Pakistan: Expansion, access, and equity. In Handbook of education systems in South Asia (pp. 665-693): Springer. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0032-9_17]
• Hayhurst, L. M. (2013). Girls as the ‘new’agents of social change? Exploring the ‘girl effect’through sport, gender and development programs in Uganda. Sociological Research Online, 18(2), 192-203. [https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2959]
• Hayhurst, L. M. (2014). Using postcolonial feminism to investigate cultural difference and neoliberalism in sport, gender and development programming in Uganda. In Sport, social development and peace (Vol. 8, pp. 45-65): Emerald Group Publishing Limited. [https://doi.org/10.1108/S1476-2854_2014_0000008002]
• Heleta, S., & Bagus, T. (2021). Sustainable development goals and higher education: leaving many behind. Higher Education, 81(1), 163-177. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00573-8]
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43, 115-135. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8]
• Hinkelman, L. (2004). Women's self-defense training: An examination of assertiveness, self-efficacy, hyperfemininity, and athletic identity: The Ohio State University.
• Hur, Y. (2018). Testing Herzberg’s two-factor theory of motivation in the public sector: is it applicable to public managers? Public Organization Review, 18, 329-343. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-017-0379-1]
• Iddy, H. (2021). Girls’ right to education in Tanzania: incongruities between legislation and practice. Gender Issues, 38(3), 324-343. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147- 021-09273-8]
• Islam, R., & Hoque, M. M. (2022). Trade-off between schooling and labor for children: understanding the determinative factors among rural households in Bangladesh. Frontiers in Sociology, 7, 839231. [https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2022.839231]
• Khan, S. (2023). Voicing Violence: An Ethnography of Rural Punjabi Women.
• Khoswe, B. (2023). The role of the church in bridging the gender inequality gap in Malawi through secondary school education: A case of the Livingstonia Synod.
• Kopnina, H. (2020). Education for the future? Critical evaluation of education for sustainable development goals. The Journal of Environmental Education, 51(4), 280-291. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2019.1710444]
• Kuss, D. J., Kristensen, A. M., Williams, A. J., & Lopez-Fernandez, O. (2022). To be or not to be a female gamer: A qualitative exploration of female gamer identity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1169. [https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031169]
• Letsch, L. (2023). Preventing/countering violent and hateful extremism in Morocco and Tunisia–understanding the role of civil society and international assistance. Conflict, Security & Development, 1-18. [https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2023.2216151]
• Malik, S., & Courtney, K. (2011). Higher education and women’s empowerment in Pakistan. Gender and education, 23(1), 29-45. [https://doi.org/10.1080/09540251003674071]
• Maqbool, S., Zafeer, H. M. I., Maqbool, S., Zeng, P., Draissi, Z., & Javed, S. (2024). Stance of Numerous Leadership Styles and Their Effect on Teaching to Sustain Academic Performance at the High School Level. Heliyon. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36438]
• Maqbool, S., Zafeer, H. M. I., Zeng, P., Maqbool, S., Draissi, Z., & Javed, S. (2024). Inventive leadership styles and their impact for achieving sustainable development goals in education at secondary schools: a case study from Multan, Pakistan. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-11. [https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03086-2]
• Maqbool, S., Zafeer, H. M. I., Zeng, P., Mohammad, T., Khassawneh, O., & Wu, L. (2023). The role of diverse leadership styles in teaching to sustain academic excellence at secondary level. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1096151. [https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2022.1096151]
• Masuda, K., & Yamauchi, C. (2020). How does female education reduce adolescent pregnancy and improve child health?: Evidence from Uganda’s universal primary education for fully treated cohorts. The Journal of Development Studies, 56(1), 63-86. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2018.1546844]
• McNeish, D., & Wolf, M. G. (2023). Dynamic fit index cutoffs for confirmatory factor analysis models. Psychological Methods, 28(1), 61. [https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000425]
• Mérida-Serrano, R., González-Alfaya, M. E., Olivares-García, M. A., Rodríguez-Carrillo, J., & Muñoz-Moya, M. (2020). Sustainable Development Goals in Early Childhood Education. Empowering Young Girls to Bridge the Gender Gap in Science. Sustainability, 12(22), 9312. [https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229312]
• Montes, F., Guerra, A. M., Higuera-Mendieta, D., De La Vega-Taboada, E., King, A. C., Banchoff, A., . . . Sarmiento, O. L. (2022). Our Voice in a rural community: empowering Colombian adolescents to advocate for school community well-being through citizen science. BMC public health, 22(1), 2411. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14559-x]
• Munro, A. K., Hunter, E. C., Hossain, S. Z., & Keep, M. (2021). A systematic review of the menstrual experiences of university students and the impacts on their education: a global perspective. PLoS One, 16(9), e0257333. [https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257333]
• Ng, D. T. K. (2022). Online aviation learning experience during the COVID‐19 pandemic in Hong Kong and Mainland China. British journal of educational technology, 53(3), 443-474. [https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13185]
• O'Connor, P. (2020). Why is it so difficult to reduce gender inequality in male-dominated higher educational organizations? A feminist institutional perspective. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 45(2), 207-228. [https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2020.1737903]
• Park, C., & Kim, D. g. (2020). Exploring the roles of social presence and gender difference in online learning. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 18(2), 291-312. [https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12207]
• Parsons, H., Houge Mackenzie, S., Filep, S., & Brymer, E. (2020). Subjective well-being and leisure. Good Health and Well-Being, 678-687. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95681-7_8]
• Polat, S., & Çelik, Ç. (2023). Perspectives on Empowering Intergenerational Relations in Educational Organizations: IGI Global. [https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-8888-1]
• Psaki, S., Haberland, N., Mensch, B., Woyczynski, L., & Chuang, E. (2022). Policies and interventions to remove gender‐related barriers to girls’ school participation and learning in low‐and middle‐income countries: A systematic review of the evidence. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18(1), e1207. [https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1207]
• Rao, N., Umayahara, M., Yang, Y., & Ranganathan, N. (2021). Ensuring access, equity and quality in early childhood education in Bangladesh, China, India and Myanmar: Challenges for nations in a populous economic corridor. International Journal of Educational Development, 82, 102380. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102380]
• Rehman, A., Jingdong, L., & Hussain, I. (2015). The province-wise literacy rate in Pakistan and its impact on the economy. Pacific Science Review B: Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(3), 140-144. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psrb.2016.09.001]
• Reuge, N., Jenkins, R., Brossard, M., Soobrayan, B., Mizunoya, S., Ackers, J., . . . Taulo, W. G. (2021). Education response to COVID 19 pandemic, a special issue proposed by UNICEF: Editorial review. International Journal of Educational Development, 87, 102485. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102485]
• Rönkkö, M., & Cho, E. (2022). An updated guideline for assessing discriminant validity. Organizational research methods, 25(1), 6-14. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120968614]
• Rosak-Szyrocka, J., & Tiwari, S. (2023). Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to Test Sustainable Development in University 4.0 in the Ultra-Smart Society Era. Sustainability, 15(23), 16167. [https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316167]
• Sharma, E. (2020). Women and politics: A case study of political empowerment of Indian women. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 40(7/8), 607-626. [https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-12-2019-0261]
• Shulla, K., Filho, W. L., Lardjane, S., Sommer, J. H., & Borgemeister, C. (2020). Sustainable development education in the context of the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 27(5), 458-468. [https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1721378]
• Smith, E. C., & Hamel, Z. (2023). Global civil society. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Global Security Studies (pp. 616-618): Springer. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74319-6_219]
• Smith, S. G., & Sinkford, J. C. (2022). Gender equality in the 21st century: Overcoming barriers to women's leadership in global health. Journal of Dental Education, 86(9), 1144-1173. [https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.13059]
• Sommer, M., Caruso, B. A., Torondel, B., Warren, E. C., Yamakoshi, B., Haver, J., . . . Okwaro, N. (2021). Menstrual hygiene management in schools: Midway progress update on the “MHM in Ten” 2014–2024 global agenda. Health Research Policy and Systems, 19(1), 1-14. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-00669-8]
• Sousa, W. (2021). Community development in Canadian adult education: Looking back and moving forward. Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education, 33(2). [https://doi.org/10.56105/cjsae.v33i2.5594]
• Staurowsky, E. J., Watanabe, N., Cooper, J., Cooky, C., Lough, N., Paule-Koba, A., . . . Issokson-Silver, K. (2020). Chasing Equity: The Triumphs, Challenges, and Opportunities in Sports for Girls and Women. Women's Sports Foundation.
• Stockemer, D., Stockemer, G., & Glaeser, J. (2019). Quantitative methods for the social sciences (Vol. 50): Springer. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99118-4]
• Tajammal, F., Arun, S., & Pourmehdi, M. (2023). Why invest in girls’ education? Evidence from the girl stipend programme in Pakistan. Equity in Education & Society, 27526461231175688. [https://doi.org/10.1177/2752646123117568]
• Tomczyk, Ł., & Walker, C. (2021). The emergency (crisis) e-learning as a challenge for teachers in Poland. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6847-6877. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10539-7]
• Tyagi, R., Vishwakarma, S., Rishi, M., & Rajiah, S. (2020). Reducing Inequalities Through Education and Skill Development Courses. Reduced Inequalities, 1-13. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71060-0_102-1]
• Unterhalter, E., Arnot, M., Lloyd, C., Moletsane, L., Murphy-Graham, E., North, A., . . . Saito, M. (2014). Interventions to enhance girls' education and gender equality: Education rigorous literature review: Department for International Development London.
• Vaughan, R. P., & Longlands, H. (2023). A technology of global governance or the path to gender equality? Reflections on the role of indicators and targets for girls’ education. Comparative education, 59(2), 282-304. [https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2022.2145774]
• Villegas, C. C., Peirolo, S., Rocca, M., Ipince, A., & Bakrania, S. (2021). Impacts of health-related school closures on child protection outcomes: a review of evidence from past pandemics and epidemics and lessons learned for COVID-19. International Journal of Educational Development, 84, 102431. [https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijedudev.2021.102431]
• Whipple, S. S., & Dimitrova‐Grajzl, V. (2021). Grit, fit, gender, and academic achievement among first‐year college students. Psychology in the Schools, 58(2), 332-350. [https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22449]
• Wolloch, N. (2022). Women and Revolution. In Moderate and Radical Liberalism (pp. 496-551): Brill. [https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004508040_013]
• Yusif, S., Hafeez-Baig, A., Soar, J., & Teik, D. O. L. (2020). PLS-SEM path analysis to determine the predictive relevance of e-Health readiness assessment model. Health and Technology, 10, 1497-1513. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-020-00484-9]
• Zafeer, H. M. I., Li, Y., & Maqbool, S. (2023). An Approach to Progress Learning Outcomes: International Graduate Students’ Engagement in Reflective Practice and Reflective Journal Writing during Pandemic. Sustainability, 15(3), 1898. [https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031898]
• Zafeer, H. M. I., Maqbool, S., & Yanping, L. (2022). Psychological and social factors and their impact on divorced and married women: A case study from Punjab Pakistan. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 63(5), 352-373. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2022.2048345]
• Zakar, P. D. M. Z., Qureshi, D. S., Ullah, D. R., Zakar, D. R., Aqil, N., & Manawar, D. R. (2013). Universal Primary Education in Pakistan: constraints and challenges. South Asian Studies, 28(2).